Dr. Steven Jones and Dr. Judy Wood Lie About ‘Traces of Tritium’ and Neutron Nukes

Dr. Steven Jones and Dr. Judy Wood Lie About ‘Traces of Tritium’ and Neutron Nukes


Hiroshima Residue

When 20 = High Normal, How Does 1,092 = Traces?

The ‘Traces Of Tritium’ WTC 9-11 Lie Is Obstruction Of Justice By Accessories To Murder


After Dr. Steven Jones was caught in the ‘Traces of Tritium Lie’ by my efforts and his own statement Cointelpro needed a new spokesman for Bogus Science.

“7. This is my ‘fave’ because lies tend to eat their young. Muon physicist Steven Jones calls 1,000 TUs “The graphs below show that hydrogen-bomb testing boosted tritium levels in rain by several orders of magnitude. (Ref.:
http://www.science.uottawa.ca/~eih/ch7/7tritium.htm  ) – http://www.journalof911studies.com/letters/a/Hard-Evidence-Rebudiates-the-Hypothesis-that-Mini-Nukes-were-used-on-the-wtc-towers-by-steven-jones.pdf

Yet, calls the EXACT SAME LEVELS quoted in nCi/L as “Traces” and “These results are well below the levels of concern to human exposure…”. http://www.journalof911studies.com/letters/a/Hard-Evidence-Rebudiates-the-Hypothesis-that-Mini-Nukes-were-used-on-the-wtc-towers-by-steven-jones.pdf   Interesting isn’t it.”  https://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2009/03/08/the-911-wtc-traces-of-tritium-lie-is-obstruction-of-justice-by-accessories-to-murder/

Recent Additions to ‘The Traces of Tritium Lie’:  :

A. “During the past decade the concentration in surface waters not in the flow of a direct discharge have average values between 10 and 60 pCi/L.” 10 pCi/L / 3.231 pCi/L (1 TU) = 3.1 TU/L.  60 pCi/L / 3.231 pCi/L = 18.6 TU/L http://www.epa.gov/safewater/radionuclides/training/downloads/Tech_Notes_for_Method_906_Tritium_06-17-09.pdf   May 2009 pg. 4  The reference in the original article was for underground water.  This reference is for Surface water.  They are essentially the same.

B. 95% of rainwater measurements taken after thousands of megatons of nuclear testing were exploded were equal to or less than the 1,092 TU/L.

Enter Dr. Judy Wood’s Bogus Science comparing 1,092 TU/L as the total amount of Tritium present at the WTC vs a single liter of precipitation during nuclear testing (ignoring the total volume of the precipitation), Cold Fusion and Nuclear reactors, so it couldn’t have been Neutron Nukes.  I will clearly show this as the scam Bogus Science it is. Comparing apples to oranges, neglecting total volumes when it assists disinfo, misrepresenting the basic physics of the examples, and total disregard of the ability to the split second timing needed to bring the towers down within the few seconds in which they fell.  http://i45.tinypic.com/2e0nvbt.jpg  – link to Wood’s new assertions in her myriad of unproven, ludicrous and magical DEWs of what destroyed the towers without ever actually stating what did destroy the towers.  The only thing Wood’s knows despite 100% classic textbook evidence of Neutron Nukes is that it wasn’t nukes.

1. The amount of residual Tritium left after a nuclear detonation is extremly small compared to the amount created. “For example, high-altitude thermonuclear explosions in tropical regions will introduce tritium directly into the stratosphere where mixing processes are very slow (Bibron, 1965; Jacobs, 1968; Libby, 1958). By comparison, low-altitude detonations in tropical regions result in the entrainment of a substantial fraction of the water vapour in the environmental atmosphere by the ascending air current that is created by the explosion.”

http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1029/ML102990100.pdf    pg. 9

2. Cold fusion, which could not even be consistently reproduced until AFTER 9-11-2001, is designed to contain the ever increasing Tritium produced within the system thereby concentrating it and uses extremely small volumes of of heavy water some cells may not even have a liter of heavy water in the cells. So while the concentrations of tritium in the heavy water can be high in a cell the total volume is very small.  (Very Basic Example: What has more sugar in it?  An 8 ounce drink with 5 spoons of sugar in it? Or a 40 ounce drink with a spoon of sugar for every 8 ounces? One is 5 times more concentrated than the other, but the total amount of sugar is the same.  Concentration without total volume is USELESS.)

In order to measure the tritium if any produced due to cold fusion reactions the deuterated Pd samples were kept in contact with distilled water for a few hours to extract the tritium by isotopic exchange into the water.   http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/KrishnanMSevidencefo.pdf

The facts of Cold Fusion develepment:

Fleischmann left for England in 1995, and the contract with Pons was not renewed in 1998 after spending $40 million with no tangible results.[67] The IMRA laboratory was closed in 1998 after spending £12 million on cold fusion work..[3]

The Boston Globe estimated in 2004 that there were only 100 to 200 researchers working in the field, most suffering damage to their reputation and career.[70]

In 2006–2007 the Italian Ministry of Economic Development founded a research program, which claimed to have found excess power up to 500%.[80]HYPERLINK  \l “cite_note-ENEA_Magazin-87”[81]

May 2008 Japanese researcher Yoshiaki Arata (Osaka University) demonstrated an experiment that produced heat when deuterium gas was introduced into a cell containing a mixture of palladium and zirconium oxide.[text 5] In an August 2009 peer-reviewed paper Akira Kitamura (Kobe University) et al. reported replication of this experiment.[85  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_fusion

So let’s look at the physics of Cold Fusion and it’s ‘explosive’ power.

1. ” Heat burst is caused by cold fusion in Pd tube. Lots of heat released makes the temperature of Pd tube rise to thousands of degrees and the heavy water around it vaporizes rapidly, the heavy water vapor raises the pressure in the cell rapidly, and the explosion occurs.” http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/ZhangXontheexplo.pdf  pg 3 S  A basic pressure cooker ‘explosion’.

2. “SRI explosion due to wayward piece of Teflon? The final report on the fatal explosion of a cold-fusion experiment at SRI International (SF#80) blames a loose piece of Teflon that may have blocked a gas outlet tube. Possible scenario: After many hours, the researchers finally noticed something was awry. When A. Riley lifted the cell from its water bath, it exploded. “The investigators believe that hot palladium ignited the pressurized mixture of oxygen and deuterium. The bottom blew off the cell, turning the rest of it into a rocket which shot upwards at 50 metres per second. It struck Riley in the head.” http://www.science-frontiers.com/sf083/sf083c16.htm

Wow, 50 meters a second – that’s 4 meters per second faster (about 8%) than the fastest human thrown baseball ever recorded   Hardly ‘rocket’ speed, let alone nuclear detonation speed.  http://hypertextbook.com/facts/2000/LoriGrabel.shtml

“Bockris says 30 or 40 such explosions have occurred in his laboratory. In most cases, they forced the top off the steel cell; six times, the bottom blew out. But these explosion caused little damage, perhaps because the palladium wires do not have a large enough surface to catalyse a big explosion.

The explosion at SRI International was far more powerful. Three other researchers apart from Riley were hit by flying debris, including Michael McKubre, who is in charge of SRI’s research on cold fusion.

McKubre has been experimenting with cells in which the experiments are kept under pressures of 60 atmospheres. But the cell that exploded, measuring only 5 centimetres in diameter and 20 cm high, was running at normal atmospheric pressure. According to Bockris, who talked to McKubre after the explosion, the cell was not even airtight at the time, so pressure could not have built up slowly inside it.”  http://nuclearpowerblog.blogspot.com/2008/04/old-news-about-epri-cold-fusion-work.html   Again a basic pressure cooker or boiler type explosion – the key here seems to be the 60 atmosphere cell could easily have built up way more pressure before it blew even though not airtight if the volume of gas overwhelmed the small openings.

After more than 20 years trying desperately to get the full truth exposed without a single penny of compensation, government harassment, government trolls, ordinary trolls, massive censorship, failure of any of my debunkers to actually address the full information of my referenced efforts, continued rebuttal of rediculous government propaganda disinfo, and a populace that doesn’t really want to know the truth – I’m f!cking tired of it and on vacation.  Believe the propaganda for all I care.

To the very few of you that have actually read my efforts and Thanked me, Thank You.  You are the reason for my efforts.  To date, the only person I have some faith rebgarding Neutron Nukes in the WTC truths is Donald Fox and who knows how long that will last.  It’s hard to resist the massive power of the US propaganda, money, black ops, government harassment, etc, et al.

Believe what you want to believe – Cold Fusion, baseball velocity and the Time machine needed to to bring it back to 2001 is what destroyed the towers.


Ed Ward, MD