Since my information recieves  virtually no coverage from the major truth organizations and sites, except for Rense.com (Example: Update: Witnesses Saw People ‘Vaporized’ on 9 11 http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/05/21/update-witnesses-saw-people-vaporized-on-9-11/ ) , and Google’s limiting the exposure of my articles, I wrote “Update…” to get more exposure for “Proven 9 11 Nukes’ http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2010/09/06/proven-9-11-nukes-us-government-involvement/.

On February 18, 2011, Zen Gardner wrote a very good 1/2 article, but why would he author 2006 information as current?  So, as noted above with censorship, Zen got the benefit of ‘doubt’ that possibly he hadn’t seen the highly referenced  current ‘Proven 9 11 Nukes’.  So I wrote Zen to ‘reblog’ his article, which he approved and sent him the site address for so he could see what I posted.  In essence, I put the picture I wanted for the article reposted it with my current 9 11 nuke information – not the 5 year old information when his article was printed, now 7 years old.  Interesting how he got my picture, but somehow missed ‘Proven 9 11 Nukes’ and STILL repubbed 7 year old information as ‘news’.

Four days later, enter Dr James Fetzer, Zen Gardner, and Veterans Today (where I’m banned and can’t even comment on the scamming of MY articles with Fetzer and VT deleting comments on my own articles – VT ‘truth?’) with the same outdated information presented as my current information on 9 11 nukes and my articles picture being presented as Zen’s 2011 picture in “9/11″.  Since my stuff (anything with my wordpress site) is heavily censored by Google (the only other source for finding my facts beside rense.com and my wordpress site), this promotion of 7 year old information will show up in Google – as my current information. It must be noted that Zen Gardner did manage to get my ‘Update:…” article posted on Before It’s News – where I’m also banned. Strange that Zen noted my article in BIN, but not in his ’9 11′? Fetzer and Veteran’s Today ‘Editing’ without Zen Gardner’s approval?

Jim Marrs’ efforts qouting my efforts was written 6 years ago and at the time, Jim exposed ‘current’ information – Jim asked me for permission to include the article in his book, to which I stated, ‘Absolutely… Thanks’.  Since Jim, made an effort to expose facts, reciprocation was in order and his facts needed to be in my article.  Up until ’9/11′ was ‘repubbed’ the same was true of Zen Gardner. It would have been no problem to simply include Marrs information without reference to Zen’s article.

The eyewitness testimony presented in Gardner’s  article were not new to me as “Bombs in the WTC Proves Nothing to Racist – Fascist Bigots” http://www.thepriceofliberty.org/06/08/21/ward.htm , and “US Government Usage of Atomic Bombs – Domestic – WTC http://www.thepriceofliberty.org/06/08/21/ward.htm , had many references regarding the eyewitness testiimony. Again, there was no need to include Zen Gardeners article in my update, but it was done along the order of ‘reciprocity’ and ‘doubt’.  There is no doubt anymore after ’9/11′.

Infiltration of the Dr, PhD of logic, James Fetzer’s covert operation.  After 11 years of promotion of ‘no planes’, thermite, and ‘magical’ weaponry, Fetzer suddenly ‘discovers’ ‘micro neutron nukes’ several years after http://radiofetzer.blogspot.com/2010/02/dr-ed-ward-md.html ‘Proven 9 11 Nukes’ he ‘discovers’ his ’9/11′ seven year old information and presents it as current.

I’m quite surprised by ’9/11′ as Fetzer, Fox, Prager and myself were supposed to be writing a letter to Jones: ‘Hard Evidence Supports the Hypothesis the mini nukes were used to Demolish the WTC towers.  A little problem seemed to arise when Fox was told I would not put my name as author without a ‘Proven 9 11 Nukes’ and my 7 major facts regarding the amount of and type of devastation – emails saved.  If he wanted to use my information, it would not fit with the scam of ‘mystery solved’, because once one sees ‘Proven 9 11 Nukes’ the evidence is overwhelming, anyone can clearly see the mystery was solved years ago and  ‘Mystery Solved is merely an expansion by a software program  of already noted information.  The next thing I know 2011 ’9/11′ is on Veterans Today.

For years, Proven 9 11 Nukes’ sat at the top of Google listings for 9 11 nukes.  This was a major problem for disinformation agents and organizations.  Fetzer’s ‘discoveries’ have weakened that position by never mentioning ‘Proven  9 11 Nukes’ – similar to ‘no planes’ scam, where there are ‘fake video’ bypasses the fact that military planes are clearly seen flying into the WTCs.

Fetzer’s recent discovery of nukes is 4 fold.  One, with Google’s assistance, Proven 9 11 nukes has been replaced with the ‘Mystery Solved’ BS.  Two, Dr Judy Wood and Dr Steven Jones are being seen as the disinformation artists they are and  Covert Operations needs a new ‘leader’ to push, Fetzer.  Three, just as they did for 9 11 ‘scholars, etc, if the operation becomes to well known – the poison pill is taken -  no planes – and the operation is broken up. 4. Actually having some real facts on something, helps Fetzer’s No Plane Disinformation.

In covert ops, ANYTHING that hinders, disrupts, halts or confuses the dispersal of factual information is GOOD.

And that’s the way it is…

A friend dropped this little find on me today: What Caused The Steel “Spire” Of The World Trade Center to ‘Vaporize’ – http://tomatobubble.com/id238.html

BTW, minor update  today. Proven 9-11 Nukes http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2010/09/06/proven-9-11-nukes-us-government-involvement/

Come Out and Play – TO  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWH85xlhZbI

Ed Ward, MD – http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/ ; https://www.facebook.com/EdWardMD3 ; http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EdWard-MD/messages

Update: Witnesses Saw People ‘Vaporized’ on 9 11  http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/05/21/update-witnesses-saw-people-vaporized-on-9-11/

Dimona Does Damascus: Israeli Nukes in Damascus, Syria http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/05/06/dimona-does-damascus-israeli-nukes-in-damascus-syria/

More US Drill Death in Waco Explosion – Drill Stops for Reality, Again http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/04/28/more-us-drill-death-in-waco-drill-stops-for-reality-again/

Boston Marathon: The Finish Line For US Treason. Drill Death. Everything’s In Place For Police State. by Ed Ward, MD http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/04/16/boston-marathon-the-finish-line-for-us-treason-drill-death-everything-is-in-place-for-police-state-by-ed-ward-md/

Pictures: US Boston Weapon – Both ‘Explosions’ – The Secret of the Pure Fusion Weapon – Li7 – Lithium 7 http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/04/19/photograph-of-boston-fireball-2nd-explosion/

The US Wouldn’t Nuke Its Own People – Wake Up and Glow  http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/04/13/the-us-wouldnt-nuke-its-own-people-wake-up-and-glow/

Original Article by Zen Gardner http://www.zengardner.com/witnesses-saw-people-vaporized-on-911/

As I revisited this whole nuke thing after all these years and was mulling over the photos of all those singed and bent vehicles, my friend Connie Smith — a long-time 9/11 researcher some of you may know — dropped me a note reminding me of something I’d completely forgotten about: the fascinating case of EMT Patricia Ondrovic.

Connie reminded me of an interview with Ondrovic, published back in October 2001 (and which I’d read circa ‘04). When I expressed an interest to reread it, she dug up a copy and sent it to me (see attached). Ms Ondrovic’s account is truly ‘bizarre’, and a testament to the fact that there were forces at play on 9/11 that modern technology — indeed, mainstream science — simply cannot explain. Please read the attached PDF doc carefully. It’s one a helluva wake-up call.

As this terrified woman was running pell-mell away from the first collapsing tower — her hair, coat and feet on fire — Ms Ondrovic witnessed vehicles parked along the street spontaneously erupt into flames. She even witnessed an aircraft disappear while in flight: “I saw something in the sky, it was a plane, but it was way out. It looked like it was over Jersey or something, then it wasn’t there anymore. I saw a small fireball, and it was gone. I saw two other planes. One came in one way, and the other came in the other way, and there was a plane in the middle that was way far off in the distance. Then the plane in the middle just disappeared into a little fire ball. It looked like the size of a golf ball from where I could see it. And the other two planes veered off into opposite directions. I just kept on running north.” And she’s got a lot more to say.

Then there’s this other chap Connie knows (“a famous author”) who’d interviewed another woman who had witnessed “people engulfed in some sort of fireball and disintegrating.” Connie just dug up the following note from this person to her, and is checking to see if I may get in touch with him directly.

“I interviewed a Red Cross worker in Dallas whose name escapes me at the moment but I have her report in my files. She told me she was sent to NYC by the Red Cross to help survivors of the WTC. She said the thing that most stuck out in her mind after interviewing dozens of people was the number that told her of looking back and seeing people engulfed in some sort of fireball and disintegrating.

Obviously, a collapsing building cannot produce such an effect. But a mini-nuke shaped charge placed in the basement to blow out the central core columns could. A small nuclear device could also explain the pyroplasmic cloud seen above the WTC, the disintegration and warping of heavy steel beams and the pulverization of so much concrete, not to mention the blood cell cancer now suffered by some of the first responders.”

Folks, this obviously isn’t Nanothermite at work here. I can’t even begin to guess what it could be. DEWs, or some similar ‘exotic’ technology, may not be that farfetched after all? As my old Alaskan buddy from Arkansas would’ve exclaimed, “Wayl, ahd be go to hayl!”

(Full quotation by kind permission of Jim Marrs, from his upcoming updated book on 9/11)

By Jim Marrs [Shirley Hoofard: Author’s interview February, 2005]

Felipe David working for Aramark Corp. tending vending machines in a basement of the North Tower recalled, “That day I was in the basement in sub-level 1 sometime after 8:30am. Everything happened so fast, everything moved so fast. The building started shaking after I heard the explosion below; dust was flying everywhere and all of a sudden it got real hot. I threw myself onto the floor, covered my face because I felt like I was burned. I sat there for a couple of seconds on the floor and felt like I was going to die, saying to myself ‘God, please give me strength.’ When I went in, I told them it was an explosion,” David, with his skin hanging in tatters may have been the person helped to safety by William Rodriguez.

http://rense.com/1.imagesH/williams_dees.jpg

Skin dripping off the body was mentioned by several 9/11 victims. Gamma ray radiation can cause a person to just feel heat, then pain and then the skin will be damaged. The skin may be vaporized, charred or left hanging.

Shirley Hoofard was a 38-year-old Red Cross worker in the Dallas area on 9/11. Hoofard was ordered to New York to begin working with victims and their families. She also was ordered not to reveal any information to the media or the public.

“It was very difficult to deal with,” she recalled. “The only way I got through it was to shut down. I didn’t think or feel. I just did what I did. By the middle of January [2002] I said ‘I have to go home.’”

But she could not get out of her mind what some of the victims told her. “Several victims told me they saw people engulfed in a fireball and disintegrating. One man said he was at work when he heard a loud noise and at the far end of the cubicles he saw a man running toward him with a fireball coming after him. The running man just exploded, flying into pieces…I heard stories like that from people from both towers….I don’t know the physics but at what temperature does a human vaporize?”

Cheers,

P.S. from Zen:

Check this out–a further corroberative explanation perhaps?:  Updated:

Proven 9-11 Nukes http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2010/09/06/proven-9-11-nukes-us-government-involvement/

1. Three Massive WTC Craters – See us government LIDAR proof: – Nothing else known to man can leave ALL the WTC debris and this particular evidence in the length of time needed , except a third generation Micro Nuke – Mini Nuke – Nuke. It’s 100% classic textbook nuclear event residue – ZERO ANOMALIES. http://www.usavsus.info/WTC-MoreEvidence.htm – Best,

2. Five Acres (1.2 Billion Pounds = Weight of Residue of 3 WTC Buildings (WTC 1, 2, 6 and 7) of WTC Land Brought to Searing Temperatures in a Few Hours by an ’Anaerobic, Chlorine Fueled “Fire” – Impossible by Basic Laws of Physics. See us gov Thermal Images proof – Nothing else known to man can leave ALL the WTC debris and this particular evidence in the length of time needed , except a third generation Micro Nuke – Mini Nuke – Nuke. It’s 100% classic textbook nuclear event residue – ZERO ANOMALIES. http://www.usavsus.info/WTC-MoreEvidence.htm Best, See: Update http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/02/18/correction-9-11-wtcs-1-2-6-and-7-neutron-nuked/

3. Tritium Levels 55 Times (normal) Background Levels assessed a numerical value of ‘traces’ and ‘of no human concern’. See us government (DOE report) proof: – Nothing but a NUCLEAR EVENT can cause ‘tritium’ formation – basic physics fact – Nothing else known to man can leave ALL the WTC debris and this particular evidence in the length of time needed , except a third generation Micro Nuke – Mini Nuke – Nuke. It’s 100% classic textbook nuclear event residue – ZERO ANOMALIES. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EdWard-MD/message/141

4. An Impossible “Fire” (Combustion Process). See Laws of Physics for Fire/Combustion Process and Dr. Cahill’s data on ‘anaerobic incineration’. – Nothing else known to man can leave ALL the WTC debris and this particular evidence in the length of time needed , except a third generation Micro Nuke – Mini Nuke – Nuke. It’s 100% classic textbook nuclear event residue – ZERO ANOMALIES. http://rense.com/general77/newlaws.htm

5. 3 Billion pounds of building instantly turned into 2 Billion pounds of micronized dust. – Nothing else known to man can leave ALL the WTC debris and this particular evidence in the length of time needed , except a third generation Micro Nuke – Mini Nuke – Nuke. It’s 100% classic textbook nuclear event residue – ZERO ANOMALIES. http://www.serendipity.li/wot/ed_ward/use_of_abombs.htm Best

6. 16 inch steel Spires that withstood 1/2 a Billion pounds of building falling on them and suddenly turn into limp noodles and partially vaporize. Nothing else known to man can leave ALL the WTC debris and this particular evidence in the length of time needed , except a third generation Micro Nuke – Mini Nuke – Nuke. It’s 100% classic textbook nuclear event residue – ZERO ANOMALIES. http://www.usavsus.info/WTC-MoreEvidence.htm  Also: The Collapse of the Spire http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7W0-W582fNQ

7. Hiroshima effect cancers in responders and locals. Nothing else known to man can leave ALL the WTC debris and this particular evidence in the length of time needed , except a third generation Micro Nuke – Mini Nuke – Nuke. It’s 100% classic textbook nuclear event residue – ZERO ANOMALIES.
http://www.usavsus.info/WTC-MoreEvidence.htm , http://www.serendipity.li/wot/ed_ward/use_of_abombs.htm

All of the above are facts are proven with referenced links of reputable data sources – many are from the government itself and more…

The September 11 Records http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/met_WTC_histories_full_01.html

Patricia Ondrovic PDF http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/9110048.PDF

“He looked absolutely terrified, he was shaking, he was pale, he was sweating. I looked at him, I said what’s wrong? He said there’s another plane headed our way, and they just blew up the Pentagon. I said, another plane? What are you talking about? I hadn’t realized that planes had hit this, I thought they just set bombs off. I didn’t realize when I got there that planes hit it. I said, what do you mean another plane? He said two planes hit the World Trade Center.” According to this – a fourth plane was on the way for WTC 7?

My partner and I grabbed our stretcher, went to put it in the back of our vehicle, and at that time, I think it was the lobby of the building behind us blew out.

Everybody started running, I didn’t see him again that day. He got thrown one way, I got thrown the other way.

I started running towards the West Side Highway, and there was another building on the corner, I guess it was a federal building, cause it was all the green and gray uniforms with the Smokey the Bear hats, the cops in there. I went to run in the lobby cause all of a sudden you couldn’t see anything.

There was smoke, there was debris, there was everything flying around. I ran into the lobby cause I had no idea what had happened and the cops that were in there were telling everybody get out, get out, get out. Where are you gonna go? Stuffs blowing up. So I ran back out…

Related article with more eye witness testimony: Bombs in the WTC Proves Nothing to Racist-Fascist Bigots.  http://www.thepriceofliberty.org/06/08/21/ward.htm

Ed Ward, MD – http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/ ; https://www.facebook.com/EdWardMD3 ; http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EdWard-MD/messages

Dimona Does Damascus: Israeli Nukes in Damascus, Syria http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/05/06/dimona-does-damascus-israeli-nukes-in-damascus-syria/

More US Drill Death in Waco Explosion – Drill Stops for Reality, Again http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/04/28/more-us-drill-death-in-waco-drill-stops-for-reality-again/

Boston Marathon: The Finish Line For US Treason. Drill Death. Everything’s In Place For Police State. by Ed Ward, MD http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/04/16/boston-marathon-the-finish-line-for-us-treason-drill-death-everything-is-in-place-for-police-state-by-ed-ward-md/

Pictures: US Boston Weapon – Both ‘Explosions’ – The Secret of the Pure Fusion Weapon – Li7 – Lithium 7 http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/04/19/photograph-of-boston-fireball-2nd-explosion/

The US Wouldn’t Nuke Its Own People – Wake Up and Glow  http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/04/13/the-us-wouldnt-nuke-its-own-people-wake-up-and-glow/

Dr. Ed Ward MD, AS, BS, MD – Reporting and investigating Constitutional abuses of the US government for almost 2 decades. AS, BS in Medical Technology – Minor in Organic Chemistry and Physics, volunteer during the Viet Nam war 6 years stateside active duty ‘med tech’ ‘US Air Farce’ – a decade experience in Medical Technology. MD degree from LSU, New Orleans – 2 decades in the field of General Practice. (My) Articles are also referenced by valid experts in their field. Dr Ed

EPA Defends Approval of Bayer’s Bee-Killing Pesticide – Clothianidin: A Multi-Species Killer/Deformer – Neurotoxin in the Nicotine Family
by Sarah Parsons December 28, 2010

For active links within the article: http://web.archive.org/web/20111216083159/http://news.change.org/stories/epa-defends-approval-of-bayers-bee-killing-pesticide, or http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EdWard-MD/message/762

“A few weeks ago, Change.org brought you news that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) turned a blind eye to clothianidin, a pesticide fingered as a culprit in Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD). Then just last week, the maker of said pesticide, Bayer CropScience, stood by the substance, saying it was perfectly safe for honeybees. Now it’s the EPA’s turn to defend itself ¡ª or rather, dodge and deny environmentalists’ allegations about the agency.

As Grist’s Tom Philpott reports, the EPA recently posted its response to the whole pesticide-killing-honeybees controversy. In a nutshell, the EPA admits no wrongdoing and says that the National Honey Bee Advisory Board, environmental groups, the press, and pretty much everyone else talking about this issue didn’t get their facts straight. But why take my word for it when you can get it straight from the horses’ mouth? Here’s what the EPA had to say for itself:

EPA recently received a letter from the National Honey Bee Advisory Board and other organizations requesting that the Agency remove clothianidin from the market. That letter and subsequent press coverage contain several erroneous statements. Reports that a clothianidin honeybee field study is a “core” study (that is, a study routinely required to support the registration of a pesticide) are not true. Further there is confusion about the review status of the study.

EPA scientists routinely reevaluate studies to determine whether the information submitted is valid and if it is relevant or useful to the regulatory matter in question (in this case a request for a new use). While this study was thought to be invalid as cited by the above groups, EPA reevaluation of the study determined that it contains information useful to EPA’s risk assessment. This field study revealed the majority of hives monitored, including those exposed to clothianidin during the previous season, survived the over-wintering period.

There are so many things wrong and inadequate with this PR-speak that I hardly know where to begin. For one, the agency says that the study evaluating clothiandin’s safety was “useful to EPA’s risk assessment.” That’s pretty hard to believe considering that the EPA’s own chemist and ecologist said that this study was flawed and incomplete. In a leaked document (pdf), EPA scientists said that “A previous field study…investigated the effects of clothianidin on whole hive parameters and was classified as acceptable.

However, after another review of this field study in light of additional information, deficiencies were identified that render the study supplemental. It does not satisfy the guideline 850.3040, and another field study is needed to evaluate the effects of clothianidin on bees through contaminated pollen and nectar.”

The EPA continues to allow farmers to spray clothianidin all over the place knowing full-well that the study evaluating this pesticide’s impact on honeybees was “deficient.” I guess the Environmental Protection Agency has a hard time doing any kind of protecting of the environment.

The EPA’s response also maintains that the study in question was not a “core” study. Again, that’s pretty hard to believe considering that this was the study used to get clothianidin registered as a pesticide in the first place.

Back in 2007, Bayer started producing clothianidin but hadn’t yet conducted studies proving the pesticide’s environmental safety. The EPA issued clothianidin a “partial registration” under the condition that Bayer would then conduct these impact assessments. Bayer did the study, and in early 2010, the EPA fully registered clothianidin.

However, a recently leaked EPA document (pdf) shows that Bayer’s study was flawed and failed to adequately assess clothianidin’s potential impact on honeybees. Whether this study was considered “core” or not is kind of a moot point. Research hasn’t proven clothianidin to be safe for honeybees, and therefore, the stuff has no business being sprayed all over America’s crop fields.

Honeybees already have it pretty rough right now: Since 2006, beekeepers reported losing 30 to 90 percent of their hives from CCD. That’s a problem for bees and for us because honeybees produce about one-third of America’s food supply through pollination. If the EPA knows that a particular pesticide could be contributing to CCD, it has an obligation to get this substance off the market until its safety is proven.

The National Honey Bee Advisory Board and a coalition of non-profits have already written to the EPA and asked the agency to remove clothianidin from the marketplace until a new study proves the substance to be safe for honeybees. You can join the coalition’s campaign by signing Pesticide Action Network’s petition asking the EPA to immediately ban clothianidin.”

The problem with nicotine, a natural pesticide – Clothianidin, is NOT nicotine, it’s a neonicotine – is it’s been around for millions of years and some insects became resistant, works great for the ones that didn’t. As for the GMO not only does it make clothianidin in every part of the corn, they also turned on or off more than 20 OTHER GENES.

As for the insecticide, finding high level wash-off everywhere it’s been being used… high levels in water. I see no reason this will not work on almost all animals all species… indeed the multiple studies showing it working on the corn fed mammals, SO ABSOLUTELY NO REASON IT COULD NOT KILL/DEBILITATE/DEFORM OFFSPRING FISH, BIRDS, MAMMALS, INSECTS.

Study: EPA-approved GMO insecticide responsible for killing off bees, contaminating entire food chain  http://csglobe.com/study-epa-approved-gmo-insecticide-responsible-for-killing-off-bees-contaminating-entire-food-chain/

Ed Ward, MD Responds to Virus + Fungus +? = GMO Insecticidal Corn  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EdWard-MD/message/576

Photo: http://scientificbeekeeping.com/scibeeimages/scikbees1.jpg

Ed Ward, MD   http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/ ;
https://www.facebook.com/EdWardMD3  ; http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EdWard-MD/messages

Dimona Does Damascus: Israeli Nukes in Damascus, Syria http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/05/06/dimona-does-damascus-israeli-nukes-in-damascus-syria/

More US Drill Death in Waco Explosion ¨Drill Stops for Reality, Again http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/04/28/more-us-drill-death-in-waco-drill-stops-for-reality-again/

Boston Marathon: The Finish Line For US Treason. Drill Death. Everything’s In Place For Police State. by Ed Ward, MD http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/04/16/boston-marathon-the-finish-line-for-us-treason-drill-death-everything-is-in-place-for-police-state-by-ed-ward-md/

Pictures: US Boston Weapon ¨Both Explosions ¨The Secret of the Pure Fusion Weapon ¨Li7 ¨Lithium 7 http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/04/19/photograph-of-boston-fireball-2nd-explosion/

The US Wouldn’t Nuke Its Own People – Wake Up and Glow  http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/04/13/the-us-wouldnt-nuke-its-own-people-wake-up-and-glow/

GeoEngineering:  The Basic Science of Cooler Summer and Frigid Winter – The Answer to the Scam of ‘If it’s ‘global warming’, why is it so cold?’  ChemTrails*

Geoengineering is very complex and ranges from engineered nano particles http://geo-engineering.blogspot.com/2013/05/electrostatic-nanocone-ion-gun-vortex-separated-ideal-drop-size-saltwater-cloud-cannons.html, to basic metals http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/global-weather-modification-assault-causing-climate-chaos-and-environmental-catastrophe/ and elements http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/366/1882/4007.long.

Regardless of which specific method is being used in our current ‘chemtrails’.  They all must display their reflective properties throughout their life in the atmosphere, unless they are magical and can change themselves.  All atmospheric particles, sunlight, and energy work via this primary undisputed fact.

“The closer the sun angle is to 90°, the more intense the solar rays. (Flashlight demonstration)

The longer the path through the atmosphere the greater chance that sunlight will be absorbed, reflected, or scattered by the atmosphere, all of which reduce solar intensity at the surface.” http://www.tasagraphicarts.com/EarthsAtmosphereAndItsSeasonsNotes.pdf

This ‘angle of reflection’ is the predominate reason for summer warmth and winter cold.  The problem of increased removal of energy as the rays have to travel through more of the same particles – even though their atmospheric concentration remains exactly the same – due to the angle of the sun to earth and the amount of atmosphere through wich energy – light – has to travel is a proven fact and undisputed. Atmospheric effect of particles are increased due to the increased distance and number of ‘particles’ through which the energy must travel.

In order to lower the summer heat, one has to freeze a few people in winter that don’t have it.  Praise the Secret Government: The Secret Government: The Constitution in Crisis – Bill Moyers.  North confesses to treason in the open, soon followed by his secretary. – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kHet9H6ZTLs.

That’s it.  It’s not rocket science, although most want to make it so.

Related Article:  Who’s Lying? A Simple Tale of Unbiased Global Warming Facts: ‘The Mysterious CO2 Planets: Mars, Venus, and Earth’   http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/05/01/whos-lying-a-simple-tale-of-unbiased-global-warming-facts-6/

Photo: http://rense.com/1.imagesH/patent_dees.jpg  Although a Google of: chemtrails planes inside – will produce several images of less sophisticated models.

* There are also changing weather patterns involved as a result of changes elsewhere, and several other at least minor contributers.  But, one cannot refute that the amount of energy allowed into our lower atmospheric system is a MAJOR factor.

Some of my other secret stuff:

Proven 9-11 Nukes = US Government Involvement http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2010/09/06/proven-9-11-nukes-us-government-involvement/

1. Three Massive WTC Craters –. http://www.usavsus.info/WTC-MoreEvidence.htm – Best,

2. Five Acres (1.2 Billion Pounds = Weight of Residue of 3 WTC Buildings (WTC 1, 2, 6 and 7) of WTC Land Brought to Searing Temperatures in a Few Hours . See us gov Thermal Images proof . http://www.usavsus.info/WTC-MoreEvidence.htm Best, See: Update http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/02/18/correction-9-11-wtcs-1-2-6-and-7-neutron-nuked/

3. Tritium Levels 55 Times (normal) Background Levels. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EdWard-MD/message/141

4. An Impossible “Fire” (Combustion Process). See Laws of Physics for
Fire/Combustion Process and Dr. Cahill’s data on ‘anaerobic incineration’. http://rense.com/general77/newlaws.htm

5. 3 Billion pounds of building instantly turned into 2 Billion pounds of
micronized dust. http://www.serendipity.li/wot/ed_ward/use_of_abombs.htm Best

6. 16 inch steel Spires that withstood 1/2 a Billion pounds of building falling on them and suddenly turn into limp noodles and partially vaporize. http://www.usavsus.info/WTC-MoreEvidence.htm

7. Hiroshima effect cancers in responders and locals. http://www.usavsus.info/WTC-MoreEvidence.htm , http://www.serendipity.li/wot/ed_ward/use_of_abombs.htm

All of the above are facts are proven with referenced links of reputable data sources – many are from the government itself and more…

Ed Ward, MD – http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/ ;
https://www.facebook.com/EdWardMD3 ; http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EdWard-MD/messages

Dimona Does Damascus: Israeli Nukes in Damascus, Syria – The Secret of False Flag ‘Terrorist’ Truck – Car Bombs photos – BLU 82 photos: http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/05/06/dimona-does-damascus-israeli-nukes-in-damascus-syria/

More US Drill Death in Waco Explosion – Drill Stops for Reality, Again – 63 Drills Since 93. http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/04/28/more-us-drill-death-in-waco-drill-stops-for-reality-again/

Boston Marathon: The Finish Line For US Treason. Drill Death. Everything’s In Place For Police State.  The Secret of the Pure Fusion Neutron Weapon – Bomb – Neutron Ray – Extremely Versatile by Ed Ward, MD http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/04/16/boston-marathon-the-finish-line-for-us-treason-drill-death-everything-is-in-place-for-police-state-by-ed-ward-md/

Pictures: US Boston Weapon – Both ‘Explosions’ – The Secret of the Pure Fusion Weapon – Li7 – Lithium 7 http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/04/19/photograph-of-boston-fireball-2nd-explosion/

Dr. Ed Ward MD, AS, BS, MD – Reporting and investigating Constitutional abuses of the US government for almost 2 decades. AS, BS in Medical Technology – Minor in Organic Chemistry and Physics, volunteer during the Viet Nam war 6 years stateside active duty ‘med tech’ ‘US Air Farce’ – a decade experience in Medical Technology. MD degree from LSU, New Orleans – 2 decades in the field of General Practice. (My) Articles are also referenced by valid experts in their field. Dr Ed

Here are some Google searches:

“proven 9 11 nukes” “Ed Ward MD” About 9,500 results (0.29 seconds) – Here two specifics gets more possible listings than any listing containing those words.

proven 9 11 nukes “Ed Ward MD” About 4,410 results (0.44 seconds – How does the general search for all words produce less results than the specific?  Can’t happen without massive censoring.

“Ed Ward MD” About 7,730 results  (0.17 seconds)  – Here unlimited by another specific even fewer listings than the 9,500 listings for query of my name  on anything.  Yet there are more listings than that just for exact match of my name and proven 9 11 nukes.

Here, one day later, after posting another article – which should increase any one’s listings – “Ed Ward MD” About 7,550 results  (0.17 seconds).  After writing 7 or so articles this month.  My specific listings in Google has dropped about 1,500 listings.

30  days ago, “Ed Ward MD” had about 9,000 listings (Not even 10% of what it should be uncensored) and after multiple articles, my listings drop to 7,550.  Amazing a Google a few minute later – About 7,370 results  (0.26 seconds) - links are being gobbled up, or more appropriately ‘Googled down’.  Now back to: About 7,550 results  (0.19 seconds).  And now back to: About 7,370 results  (0.17 seconds).

Where she stops – nobody knows.  Guess I should write another article to get it below 7k?

proven 9 11 nukes ed ward md About 24,300 results (0.36 seconds) – predominately other sites some with incomplete information and of course their fully explained BS.

Check out this covert op smear tribenet truthers on the info bunker – just one of many covert op sites.  When the facts can’t be addressed personnel attacks are all that is left. http://tribes.tribe.net/infobunker/thread/0bacb5c2-6274-4c91-a6a6-3738613b67d1#7767ec19-5e71-4fa8-bd2a-865a5bb69ca2

The beginning of the article comments start midway and neglects a tremendous amount of personal attacks (based on the time stamps of the article -over 3 hours worth of responses) as noted in the first statement that is shown. Note that his quack post is no where to be found, nor are about 3 hrs of similar scam BS present. It’s easy to see what happens to the few individuals exposing or looking for the referenced facts on ‘truth’ sites.

It’s pretty much SOP, bullying, deleting information, scamming information, personal attacks while avoiding presented facts, etc, usually with moderator protection. When you see this, you are on a covert op site. Real truth sites do not tolerate this garbage and are actually investigating facts. Not to say you can’t get information from covert ops, because one most certainly can, you just have to pick it out. Part of covert ops job is making that difficult for the people to do.

“ROFL… omg that’s it…  i’ma quack… get some help… u may need it if u are getting benifits for this BS you scam in personal attacks.  Got no facts… use personal attacks… 1. on the SOP of disinfo agents… “

Note: Many previous comments have been deleted, and fixed  to promote a personal attack.  That’s standard covert operations scumbags, not anyone looking for the truth.  It happened/happens on many covert op sites,  Alex Jones,  Seven Jones, Judy Wood, Veterans Today, Letsroll – changed links in articles, changed comments - Phil Jayhan ‘s Let’s Roll Forum Urges “Lies for ‘Truth’”, SOP for Covert Ops http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EdWard-MD/message/542, GLP, ATS,  etc, et - everyone I was on one.  Partial truth, hiding truth, deleting posts and scam is all that will be seen on covert op sites and their agenda driven information.  Their little scam image fixed to my name – similar to letrollforums scam search for the truth on – proven 9 11 nuke- images,  and disinformation facts hiding massive evidence of treason and murder.

Check out Gordon Duff’s Veterans Today scam link which links me to their latest POS government propaganda piece. Using revenue from ads to help hide the facts of Proven 9 11 Nukes, Pure Fusion Nukes, Death Drills, Truck Bombs, Car Bombs, Chelyabinsk missile, etc.

Ed Ward MD | Veterans Today. veteranstoday.com/author/ed-ward-md/‎ The #3 google listing for “Ed Ward, MD” – Do not take this link for any information – it only goes to a banned blog – not noted as banned, just my name in red, and a banned poster by Veterans Today supposedly On Veterans Today.

And that’s just one of the ways ‘The matrix’ and so called ‘truth groups’ work.

Proven 9-11 Nukes http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2010/09/06/proven-9-11-nukes-us-government-involvement/

1. Three Massive WTC Craters – See us government LIDAR proof: – Nothing else known to man can leave ALL the WTC debris and this particular evidence in the length of time needed , except a third generation Micro Nuke – Mini Nuke – Nuke. It’s 100% classic textbook nuclear event residue – ZERO ANOMALIES. http://www.usavsus.info/WTC-MoreEvidence.htm – Best,

2. Five Acres (1.2 Billion Pounds = Weight of Residue of 3 WTC Buildings (WTC 1, 2, 6 and 7) of WTC Land Brought to Searing Temperatures in a Few Hours by an ’Anaerobic, Chlorine Fueled “Fire” – Impossible by Basic Laws of Physics. See us gov Thermal Images proof – Nothing else known to man can leave ALL the WTC debris and this particular evidence in the length of time needed , except a third generation Micro Nuke – Mini Nuke – Nuke. It’s 100% classic textbook nuclear event residue – ZERO ANOMALIES. http://www.usavsus.info/WTC-MoreEvidence.htm Best, See: Update http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/02/18/correction-9-11-wtcs-1-2-6-and-7-neutron-nuked/

3. Tritium Levels 55 Times (normal) Background Levels assessed a numerical value  of ‘traces’ and ‘of no human concern’. See us government (DOE report) proof: – Nothing but a NUCLEAR EVENT can cause ‘tritium’ formation – basic physics fact – Nothing else known to man can leave ALL the WTC debris and this particular evidence in the length of time needed , except a third generation Micro Nuke – Mini Nuke – Nuke. It’s 100% classic textbook nuclear event residue – ZERO ANOMALIES. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EdWard-MD/message/141

4. An Impossible “Fire” (Combustion Process). See Laws of Physics for Fire/Combustion Process and Dr. Cahill’s data on ‘anaerobic incineration’. – Nothing else known to man can leave ALL the WTC debris and this particular evidence in the length of time needed , except a third generation Micro Nuke – Mini Nuke – Nuke. It’s 100% classic textbook nuclear event residue – ZERO ANOMALIES. http://rense.com/general77/newlaws.htm

5. 3 Billion pounds of building instantly turned into 2 Billion pounds of micronized dust. – Nothing else known to man can leave ALL the WTC debris and this particular evidence in the length of time needed , except a third generation Micro Nuke – Mini Nuke – Nuke. It’s 100% classic textbook nuclear event residue – ZERO ANOMALIES. http://www.serendipity.li/wot/ed_ward/use_of_abombs.htm Best

6. 16 inch steel Spires that withstood 1/2 a Billion pounds of building falling on them and suddenly turn into limp noodles and partially vaporize. Nothing else known to man can leave ALL the WTC debris and this particular evidence in the length of time needed , except a third generation Micro Nuke – Mini Nuke – Nuke. It’s 100% classic textbook nuclear event residue – ZERO ANOMALIES. http://www.usavsus.info/WTC-MoreEvidence.htm

7. Hiroshima effect cancers in responders and locals. Nothing else known to man can leave ALL the WTC debris and this particular evidence in the length of time needed , except a third generation Micro Nuke – Mini Nuke – Nuke. It’s 100% classic textbook nuclear event residue – ZERO ANOMALIES. http://www.usavsus.info/WTC-MoreEvidence.htm , http://www.serendipity.li/wot/ed_ward/use_of_abombs.htm

All of the above are facts are proven with referenced links of reputable data sources – many are from the government itself and more…

Ed Ward, MD –

http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/ ;
https://www.facebook.com/EdWardMD3 ; http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EdWard-MD/messages

Dimona Does Damascus: Israeli Nukes in Damascus, Syria http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/05/06/dimona-does-damascus-israeli-nukes-in-damascus-syria/

More US Drill Death in Waco Explosion – Drill Stops for Reality, Again http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/04/28/more-us-drill-death-in-waco-drill-stops-for-reality-again/

Boston Marathon: The Finish Line For US Treason. Drill Death. Everything’s In Place For Police State. by Ed Ward, MD http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/04/16/boston-marathon-the-finish-line-for-us-treason-drill-death-everything-is-in-place-for-police-state-by-ed-ward-md/

Pictures: US Boston Weapon – Both ‘Explosions’ – The Secret of the Pure Fusion Weapon – Li7 – Lithium 7 http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/04/19/photograph-of-boston-fireball-2nd-explosion/

Related article: Be sure and check out the comments for significant other information by myself and another poster. http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=465

Best,

Dr Ed

Jones’ miraculous, super-duper, double top secret nanothermite burns at 430 C according to his research. There is no doubt high explosives will burn. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bO5mMhEGIiM But, if they burn, they can’t be around later to explode. Unless or course its magical, miraculous, ‘matter’, then, and only then, can it burn and then be around later to explode. An inhaled lit cigarette produces 400 to 780 C. A match burns at 600 to 800 C. http://www.derose.net/steve/resources/engtables/flametemp.html

But, in the above pictured fireball, that according to NIST was hot enough to weaken steel, miraculous thermite didn’t burn at 430 C, nor even at the temperatures of the fireball.

According to Jones and and his disinformation cronies, thermite waited an hour to suddenly react explosively, and even then, not all of the coatings of the steel beams burned. Some of coating ‘decided’ not to burn despite being surrounded by burning thermite? It melts through massive steel girders, but has no effect on the thermite coating that will burn at 430 C?

And what of the supposed thermite coatings on the steel that survived the nuke? Did the thermite coating burn off without effecting the steel, indeed there are tons of steel devoid of any paint or coating – classic nuclear residue for steel – how does thermite burn off without effecting the steel?

And what about, tons of concrete, file cabinets, phones, computers, over 1,000 people where not even a single strand of DNA was found, anaerobic fire, etc., et al, and yet paper didn’t burn. Apparently, all but the paper was coated in invisible, super duper thermite too? http://www.rense.com/general86/therm.htm

Even the best nanothermite’s, a proven deflagraton mixture http://rense.com/general77/geddno.htm, erroneously inflated calculations require a pound of thermite to melt 1.3 to 2 pounds of steel depending upon the quality of the steel and ASSUMING 100% of the total energy produced is absorbed by the steel – NO HEAT LOSS to its surroundings other than the steel itself.

This inane assumption markedly increases the ‘calculated’ amount of melted steel that will be produced. As anyone can see when thermite ignites it gives off a MASSIVE amount of heat to its surrounding environment. (Note: These calculations are from Jones’ 2007 9 11 studies site, not me. Also, note that thermite only BURNS and doesn’t explode just like all deflagration mixtures – the NEED for thermite to evolve into magical exploding thermite hasn’t happened, yet. http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200704/JLobdillThermiteChemistryWTC

Real Experiment with Real Results: Weigh a piece of steel. Put a gram of thermite on it and ignite it. When the thermite finishes burning, pour off the steel, remove and ‘slag’, weigh the steel and subtract from the original weight. But, if one did that, they couldn’t inflate the amount of melting steel produced by ‘calculations’ which ASSUME every calorie of heat (100%) produced goes directly to the steel.

LINEAR THERMITE CUTTING CHARGES: This is Jones’ pick for and example of what took down the towers? And in reality, it is almost state of the art (the ones used to cut scrap, are about 6 foot long and burn for several minutes), since no building has ever been demolished using thermite and no company has used thermite to ever demolish a building then, or now. Although what Jones’ shows is a toy compared to working thermite torches.

This is what is needed (or similar), used and for all demolitions since 1995 when they were first made, or similar. These, you just wrap around what you want to cut – tremendously less set up time and fewer people needed. But even those explosive cutters wont touch the core columns http://www.securitysystems-tech.com/articles/sabrex-cuts-through-competition It’s either this or several million of Jones’ – Linear Thermite Cutting Charges. See if you can find some ‘thermite’ flexible, linear, contact cutting charges.

“Physical mixing presents some limitations, such as not homogeneous distribution of oxidizer and fuel,…

“In sol-gel, the random distribution of the particles and the inherent organic impurities result in limited performance.”

This approach has several advantages over previous investigations, such as lower ignition temperature, enhanced interfacial contact area, reduced impurities and Al oxidation, tailored dimensions, and easier integration into a microsystem to realize functional devices.

“This approach results in enhanced atomic mixing and reduced impurities.” http://oatao.univ-toulouse.fr/2799/1/Zhang_2799.pdf 2009

One current promising nanocomposite being pursued by the researchers at LLNL involves the use of Fe2O3 which is generated using the sol-gel method. The reason that Fe2O3 is chosen is because its thermite reaction with UFG aluminum is very exothermic (with only CuO and MoO3 yielding greater energy of reaction). An example of the high degree of mixing and uniformity between two nanophases is found in Figure 7, which indicates the excellent dispersion of Al and Fe on the nanoscale domain. http://infohouse.p2ric.org/ref/34/33115.pdf 2002

The above statements clearly show that purity, uniformity and equal dispersal of all reactants is vital for adequate performance. Remember, PURITY – has ONLY the necessary elements needed to complete a thermite reaction – no extra elements – no impurities, Uniformity – one section of thermitic material should have almost exactly the same ratio of elements as any other section of thermitic material. It’s important when we start to see all the impurities and ‘areas of concentration’ in these so called – pure, uniform active thermite chips.

“Here we go into this catastrophe of research (Purity and Uniformity Rule): Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9 11 World Trade Center Catastrophe.”

First, let’s thin the herd – It’s ok, Jones already knows: “The (actually more silver colored in non oxidized portions) grey portion of the ‘active thermite’ portion does nothing to contribute to a thermitic reacton. “…a gray layer in which mainly iron and oxygen are found.” The gray layer was found to consist mostly of iron oxide so that it probably does not contribute to the exotherm,…” 1. There was nothing in the grey layer for Fe Oxide (R/O – Fe3O4 – grey, silver color and more O than Fe – fits nicely http://www.minelco.com/en/Minerals/Iron-Oxide/ (obvious for anyone that uses spectroscopy daily), Fe2O3 is red = Rust) to react with. 2. Nanothermite must be a homogenous layer of reactants, not a slab of stuff here and a slab of stuff there.

The grey layer is not thermite and I can see no way it interacts in any significant way with the red layer. So, just forget about it for now. The picture is confusing enough with just the ‘possible’ red layer of ‘thermite’.

The red/grey chip: “the concentration of the particles was found to vary locally,” – Now, the red chip has problems too. Nanothermite concentraton levels need to be consistent throughout for optimal performance. Not enough to prove a scam yet, but getting close.

For those not familiar with Xeds = Xray Energy-Dispersive Spectroscopy. Excited electrons release energy at a specific wavelength depending on its atoms characteristics, before and after bonding with another atom. The machine measures the wavelength and plots it.

Now for reading. Each atom, molecule, compound or molecular crystal has its own wavelength and if everything works right it will always be at it’s ‘count’ or wavelength ‘spot’. The height of the line at the spot tells you what the concentration is provided one is interested in doing ‘calculations’. It’s not needed for what is required. The height of the lines are ‘proportional’. So, you don’t get concentrations, you get a ‘ratio’. One line is twice the height of another, then there is twice as much of the taller than the shorter. If an element is counted more than once – a different form of that element is present, like Fe, Fe3O4 and Fe2O3, each will be in it’s count spot.

“The four spectra in Fig. (6) indicate that the gray layers are consistently characterized by high iron and oxygen content including a smaller amount of carbon.” Actually, as you read on you will find this is not correct. There are more molecules, some are on the chart and not being counted (can be hidden very easily by making ‘background’ adjustments on the instrument) – look at the 5.9 count spot – Jones does post the real results later but not until he’s scammed them as having JUST the needed ‘active thermite ingredients’.

“The chemical signatures found in the red layers are also quite consistent (Fig. 7), each showing the presence of aluminum (Al), silicon (Si), iron (Fe) and oxygen (O), and a significant carbon (C) peak as well.” Again, this is not correct. All the specimens also have Na, K, S, and Ca. They are very small quantities or this machine, like older Xeds without an improved spectroscopy window, isn’t doing well on the lighter elements.

But, most can be seen, just look at their count spot and you’ll see them. Spoiler – there’s a LOT more, that’s not getting told yet. At this point, I’m done with this scam of ‘active thermite’, enough for me to know, but I want you to know. No homogenous mixture, and impurities are rampant – Jones does post the real results later but not until he’s scammed them as having JUST the needed ‘active thermite ingredients’.

“To confirm and to quantify these observations, XEDS spectra (subsequent plots) were acquired from specific regions of high Si, Al and Fe concentrations.” Now we see another impurity previously hidden that also showed up in the ‘unwashed’ sample, and this sampling, yet somehow – instrument adjustments – don’t show up previously. Mg shows up in the 1.3 count spot in the unwashed sampling – not noted – but is finally called here. Its also in the 1.3 count spot of the silicon sampling and not noted.

“The existence of elemental aluminum and iron oxide leads to the obvious hypothesis that the material may contain thermite.” A google of – aluminum iron oxide paint – produces a similar list of ‘active thermites’.

“Red/gray chips were subjected to heating using a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC). The data shown in Fig. (19) demonstrate that the red/gray chips from different WTC samples all ignited in the range 415-435 °C.” This will be dealt with in the ‘blow torch’ ignition later in the article.

We already know this general term ‘iron oxide’ is specifically Fe3O4. Why not call it specifically? This happens ‘according to jones’ every time, so where is any evidence? Like a picture of the sample igniting at 415 degrees? We will see why when we get to the blow torch. “The gray layer was found to consist mostly of iron oxide so that it probably does not contribute to the exotherm,”

“Fig. (18). XEDS spectrum obtained from a probe of the region of high iron concentration on the MEK-soaked red chip,” Here more impurities – hidden prior – start showing up. The impurities NA, S and P are finally shown. If they are in this small section sampling – they must also be in the total scamming, er scanning results – but somehow didn’t show? Well some showed, they were just ignored – as clearly shown.

“Fig. (19). Differential Scanning Calorimeter (DSC) traces for four red/gray chip samples found in World Trade Center dust collections.” There is no doubt something burned in the DSC. There is also no doubt that the amount or what burned is NOT the equal. 1. They ignite at different heats. They release different amounts of energy. If they were all the same, they would all burn at exactly the same termperature and give exactlly the same amouint of heart. For me, something like MEK is responsible. It burns at 404 when it is the only sampling. Varying amounts of residual MEK or hydrocarbon would produce these results. Now, supposedly, these were not the chips soaked in MEK. But, one thing we know is if this was truly ‘nano thermite’ it would be pure and it would all burn exactly at the same temperature and always give the same amount of heat.

“Fig. (20). Photomicrographs of residues from red/gray chips ignited in the DSC. Notice the shiny-metallic spheres and also the translucent spheres.” Ooops, active thermite that burns at 3,000 to 4,000 C ignites at 400, but doesn’t ignite the rest of the ‘active thermite’ and how does the rest of the ‘active thermite’ not burn at 400 or even 3,000 degrees that would happen if this was truly ‘active thermite’. How does that happen. Impossible by everything we know about regular themate, let alone super duper miraculous nano thermite. Thermate is notorious for being EXTREMELY hard to put out once it starts burning.

“Fig. (21). Spheroid found in post-DSC residue showing iron-rich sphere and the corresponding XEDS spectrum.” Here anothing unseen impurity shows up, Ca. Yes, it doesn’t show up in the spectrum anywhere else, but the unwashed samplling, but to be in the residual, IT MUST BE IN THE ORIGNIAL, unless Jones’ is going to start claiming ‘active thermite’ is also a nuclear reaction.

“5. Flame/Ignition Tests The DSC used in our studies does not allow for visual inspection of the energetic reaction. Therefore tests were also performed with a small oxyacetylene flame applied to red/gray chips.” What he is supposedly try to prove could easily be done on a lab “hot plate’ and a piece of steel. Simply place non flame heater at 410, let the plate and steel equalize, set the ‘active thermite’ on the steel and turn the heater up to 420 and start recording. But instead, Jones pulls out an oxyacetylene torch which burns from 3,000 to 5,000 degrees http://www.welderssupplyco.com/showpage.php?pid=49 . This would also be consistent with the white – blue flame which indicates a similar temperature. Even at this temperature, it takes a while to get the ‘active thermite’ to get a tiny flame that does not engulf the entire sample. Just like in the DSC, only a very small portion of the sample burns.

Even Jones knows this is not ‘exploding nor even burning thermite’. This small flake is what Jones states destroyed inches of steel. Yet, he’s going to test it with his fingers. I’d like to see a comparison burn done with just regular burning ‘nano thermite’. This would be equivalent to a ‘scientist’ dipping his finger in nitroglycerine, then tapping it on the table to see if its nitroglycerine. He’s not crazy, just a covert op government scumbag that has been used in the past to destroy ‘cold fusion’ by saying the reaction was based on muon energy. Pons and Fleischman both noted the energy is NOT muon based. But pumped by government media, Jones’ muon scam was enough to hide the massive ‘cold fusion’ potential, which is also the trigger and reactants of the ‘pure fusion neutron bomb.. Next, he introduces the poison pill super duper exploding thermite for the WTCs derstruction. Currently, he’s being used to hide pure fusion bombs as ‘super duper secret nano thermite bombs’ also, subtely being promoted by military sources. Note: Proves what he is testing does not explode.

“Fig. (23). Silvery-gray spheroids (left) are seen after the ignition test of red/gray chip from sample 1; some of the porous red material remains; both can be seen in the corresponding SEM image (right).” Again, proof we are not dealing with ‘active thermite’ since if it’s ‘active thermite’ once ignited its ALL going to burn. Jones proves whatever he has does NOT explode.

“We observe that the spheroidal residues from ignition of red chips (Figs. 25, 26) possess a strikingly similar chemical signature to a typical XEDS spectrum from a spheroid generated by commercial thermite (Fig. 24). This similarity supports our hypothesis that the red chips are indeed a form of thermite.” Here Jones supposed proves a form of thermite, but disproves ‘active nano thermite’ which is tremendously more pure than regular commercial thermite – multiple unoted elevated count spots. Known by Jones, but hidden, heres the quote without the extra BS – Ordinary thermite…and gives a significantly broader trace than super-thermite [21] – cited link doesn’t work and not needed since Jones himself shows the truth – nano thermite DOES NOT have these impurities.

“XEDS spectrum from a sphere found in the WTC dust.” Adds a new impurites with Ti, and C along with repeat impurites of Ca, K, S, Mg – again if they are in the residue, they must be in the original – just not being shown. Even in this XEDS count note the unlabeled count spots at 3.9.

“We have noted that ordinary thermite acts as an incendiary when ignited. However, when the ingredients are ultrafine-grain and are intimately mixed, the mixture reacts very rapidly, even explosively [20]. Using this refernce for explosives is FALSE. http://infohouse.p2ric.org/ref/34/33115.pdf This article clearly shows ‘nanothermite’ being used as an ‘initiator’, synonym ‘igniter’, used in a ‘contained’ environment, much like regular thermites use in pyrotechnics. It is not an explosive, makes no gas in its reaction so it can not add anything to propulsion or explosive effects while confined. It can however rapidly heat a deflagration chemical – like thermite or nanothermite – that will explode under confinement.

“We make no attempt to specify the particular form of nano-thermite present until more is learned about the red material and especially about the nature of the organic material it contains.” Hasn’t been done yet, the same as the rest of the follow up. It’s not going to happen, can’t be done. Specifics will show the scam, and will NOT be done.”

“A graph in an article on nanostructured energetic materials [21] shows that the energy/volume yield for Al/Fe2O3 composite material exceeds that of TNT, HMX and TATB explosives commonly used in demolitions (see Fig. (30)).” Another attempt to link nano thermite to explosives. There is no doubt that current nano technology produces massive gasless energy per unit of volume. But, that energy is deflaglatory energy, not explosive. Nanothermite is to regular explosives as lithium 7 is to nukes.

“We have observed that some chips have additional elements such as potassium – K – already noted, lead – Pb, barium – Ba – new and copper – Cu – new.” More impurities show up – all the unlabeled count spots finally making a small appearance.

Ed Ward, MD – http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/ ;
https://www.facebook.com/EdWardMD3 ; http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EdWard-MD/messages

Active Thermitic Material found in WTC Dust -http://www.benthamscience.com/open/tocpj/articles/V002/7TOCPJ.pdf
http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=143205 picture graphic of calculations

Related articles:

For links and pictures of WTC steel flanges http://www.hoaxofthecentury.com/911Demolition1.htm

For the Latest:

Dimona Does Damascus: Israeli Nukes in Damascus, Syria http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/05/06/dimona-does-damascus-israeli-nukes-in-damascus-syria/

More US Drill Death in Waco Explosion – Drill Stops for Reality, Again http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/04/28/more-us-drill-death-in-waco-drill-stops-for-reality-again/

Boston Marathon: The Finish Line For US Treason. Drill Death. Everything’s In Place For Police State. by Ed Ward, MD http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/04/16/boston-marathon-the-finish-line-for-us-treason-drill-death-everything-is-in-place-for-police-state-by-ed-ward-md/

Pictures: US Boston Weapon – Both ‘Explosions’ – The Secret of the Pure Fusion Weapon – Li7 – Lithium 7 http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/04/19/photograph-of-boston-fireball-2nd-explosion/

Reblogged from Donald Fox:

While Israel ‘officially’ denies activity in Syria bombings, there is adequate documentation of its actions: Syria: Israel bombed research center near Damascus, other targets. http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4375988,00.html

Here is the best video I could find of the recent Damascus explosions. http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=e84pVGsP6YU (Now has adult requirement – Didn’t at first) Note the very first explosion you hear, then note the difference in the later explosions – louder and quicker – most likely the missiles, the first explosion’s targets. Note the brightness of the first explosion compared to the secondary explosions – much less bright. All suspicious but not enough to make a ‘proven’ call by any scientific evaluation – no data other than visual.

Enter: ‘Israel used depleted uranium shells in air strike’ – Syrian source. “Israel used “a new type of weapon”, a senior official at the Syrian military facility that came under attack from the Israeli Air Force told RT.”

“When the explosion happened it felt like an earthquake,” said the source, who was present near the attack site on the outskirts of Damascus on Sunday morning.

“Then a giant golden mushroom of fire appeared. This tells us that Israel used depleted uranium shells.”

And then proceeds to infer that it was used as a ‘bunker buster’. http://rt.com/news/syria-israel-uranium-air-strike-847/

There is no way the shallow crater seen was a subsurface crater. A slightly above ground explosion leaves a saucer shape – path of least resistance – size and depth dependent on the bombs height from the ground and power. Subsurface explosions ‘excavate’ the earth above them at a markedly steeper angle, similar to cone shaped. “Today’s best penetrator missiles can reach a depth of only about six meters in dry rock, and as Robert W. Nelson of Princeton University has argued in Physics Today, limits on the strengths of materials suggest that 20 meters might be a theoretical maximum. Nuclear Bunker Buster Bombs” http://203.68.243.199/saweb/pdf.file/en/e031/e031p092.pdf

Depleted Uranium, DU, is used as casing for fission and fusion bombs. http://glasstone.blogspot.com/2006/03/clean-nuclear-weapon-tests-navajo-and.html (Old citing is valid until 2002 – it was handy)(From a strictly military aspect – there are remarkable similarities between Waco and Damascus. Each had multiple ‘compartmentalized explosive’ targets, witnesses, similar explosive sound and light patterns including secondary explosions, similar surface residue – above ground detonation. The question, Was Waco a dry run for Damascus?, certainly needs to be investigated. The fertilizer company has the markings of a CIA front: Sold several times recently – present owners are SEALED by the Court. This company also seemed to skirt all regulations despite multiple reported problems. These days, for that to happen one needs to be connected or the government.)

A lot of evidence points to pure fusion nuke – exact variant unknown. But, again like Boston http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/04/19/photograph-of-boston-fireball-2nd-explosion/, and unlike New York where we have proven nukes. there is not enough data for proven. http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2010/09/06/proven-9-11-nukes-us-government-involvement/ – http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/05/02/mystery-solved-the-wtc-was-nuked-on-911/.

Update: Jim Stone (see comments) has some video evidence that is classic nuke. http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/rogue2.html There seems little doubt that Israel used nukes. Not that it is a big deal, the US uses them on their own citizens for US ‘false flags’. http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/04/19/photograph-of-boston-fireball-2nd-explosion/ and http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/04/28/more-us-drill-death-in-waco-drill-stops-for-reality-again/ The Tap has some additional information and visuals. http://the-tap.blogspot.com/2013/05/israel-nukes-syria.html

There simply isn’t enough evidence to say proven – most likely scenario, definitely. But, the ‘headlie’ indicates I have proof of nukes in Damascus. (Hint: Check the photo again and what do you see? Spoiler: Crater for a ‘vehicular’ bomb = nuclear power – unless a semi with 20 or so tons of explosives, a missile, or even a regular bomb set to detonate on contact after being dropped will also leave craters. But, for a no missile, no dropped bomb scenario, just a regular vehicle up and explodes and leaves a crater – that’s nuke power)

In a less recent bombing we see the EXTREMELY RARE photo of the blast ‘site’ and not just the immediate area around it – these do not usually make it passed MSM, so any time a supposed ‘vehicle bomb’ goes off and leaves a crater – its a nuke until proven otherwise. Unless you have a vehicle that you can drive around with AT LEAST 6 TONS of high grade military explosive – BLU 82 – used to make instant helicopter clearings in Viet Nam – 1/4 inch steel casing and 6.3 tons of military explosive. http://www.serendipity.li/wot/ed_ward/use_of_abombs.htm It takes at least 15 to 20 tons of explosives to make a crater when in the back of a semi trailer.

Note: Helicopters need flat surfaces to land in, a small tilt and the blades hit the ground.  The ‘fireball’ is BLU 82 also and can be used for comparison to our US fireballs – way different patterns.  Note how the flame hugs the ground, no rising fireball to speak of, no extreme brightness, no soil lifting, etc.

It’s a tidbit I picked up from covert op Joe Vialls. http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2012/10/06/wtc-covert-operations-even-joe-vialls-corrupt-inept-the-mouthpiece-for-someone-else-question-everything-when-something-doesnt-add-up-samuel-cohen-shame-quotes/ These pictures and the video that went along with them disappeared from the net after my first article which mentioned them. “The pictures on the left and right show the two American Special Forces 1,000 pound ANFO truck bombs immediately after detonation of the charges. Seeing is believing. Though each vehicle is pressed down firmly on its shock absorbers by the force of the blasts, a clear air gap is visible between the vehicle chassis and the road in both cases, proving forever more that surface car and truck bombs do not make craters. Note the black oily residue which is already forming at the edges of the fireballs, characteristic of all fuelled low explosives including ANFO and Potassium Chlorate. By direct comparison, the smoke resulting from a critical nuclear device is pure white in color, as shown in the center picture captured by an Indonesian Security Service camera.” “Even after the two fake “car bomb crater” films were produced in Australia and then flashed around the world to convince an increasingly skeptical global public, the Cabal knew it had a very big problem. So much so, that by the time of the third Indonesian micro nuke outside the Australian Embassy in Jakarta, western media editors were ordered not to show any pictures of the crater at all. Though there is one such picture on this page, it was obtained from military rather than media sources.”

“Sooner or later the ‘car bomb crater’ lie had to be knocked on the head forever, a task which was finally completed on camera by American Special Forces in Louisiana. Two light trucks were both loaded up with 1,000 pound ANFO [Ammonium Nitrate Fuel Oil] bombs, and then filmed with high-speed cameras when they were detonated. Note very carefully here that each 1,000-pound bomb was more than twice the weight of the 200-kilo Potassium Chlorate bomb claimed by Australian top cop Keelty, and ANFO has a velocity of detonation of around 10,000 feet per second, or nearly three times as fast as 3,200 feet per second of Potassium Chlorate….” http://web.archive.org/web/20051208084823/http://www.vialls.com/myahudi/embassynuke.html

These pictures clearly show what happens to the ground under a ‘vehicle explosion’. One can find heavier weight vehicles with even more explosives that will do the same thing – but the video is always cut before you can see there is little to no damage under the trucks – at least until you get to 15 or so tons. (I have been trying to find and re-expose these photos for years – so, it was a good day when I dug them up. This exposes many past false flag bombings and hopefully may prevent a few once the facts of car, truck bombs is well known.)

Google – “car bomb” craters - for some impressive craters – MASSIVE Power – All nukes.

Ed Ward, MD – http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/ ;
https://www.facebook.com/EdWardMD3 ; http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EdWard-MD/messages

More US Drill Death in Waco Explosion – Drill Stops for Reality, Again http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/04/28/more-us-drill-death-in-waco-drill-stops-for-reality-again/

Boston Marathon: The Finish Line For US Treason. Drill Death. Everything’s In Place For Police State. by Ed Ward, MD http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/04/16/boston-marathon-the-finish-line-for-us-treason-drill-death-everything-is-in-place-for-police-state-by-ed-ward-md/

Pictures: US Boston Weapon – Both ‘Explosions’ – The Secret of the Pure Fusion Weapon – Li7 – Lithium 7 http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/04/19/photograph-of-boston-fireball-2nd-explosion/

Old news still ignored – Proven 9 11 Nukes – http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2010/09/06/proven-9-11-nukes-us-government-involvement/

Dr. Ed Ward MD, AS, BS, MD – Reporting and investigating Constitutional abuses of the US government for almost 2 decades. AS, BS in Medical Technology – Minor in Organic Chemistry and Physics, volunteer during the Viet Nam war 6 years stateside active duty ‘med tech’ ‘US Air Farce’ – a decade experience in Medical Technology. MD degree from LSU, New Orleans – 2 decades in the field of General Practice. (My) Articles are also referenced by valid experts in their field. Dr Ed

US Government Problem: Video of the planes needed to actually fly into the WTCs are readily available to the public.

US Government Solution: Promote the Videos as ‘fake’ based on ‘pixel’ BS – This solves the ‘evidence’ problem while never noting that the planes are NOT commercial airliners – which are not structurally capable of performing the tasks and look nothing like the photographic proof that commercial airliners are ‘not in the picture’ and US Government Military Planes are ‘in the picture’. Actually, an excellent scam premise when pumped out by the covert op truth troops.

Wingtips say B 767-400ERE-10A is THE CLONE USED to fly into the WTCs – Unless someone has a version that matches the video better.

The videos show that a Boeing 767-400ER E-10A was the supposed Super-Powered’ Commercial Airliner’. (One of these all very similar clones is clearly seen – one version of these clones has the ‘swept’ back wingtips used to discredit the video as fakery by some… Boeing 767-400ER E-10A) All early videos show the pod and the swept back wing – Recently, I’ve seen newer posts of truth videos in which the planes have neither.

Something that is fake can prove nothing, except that it is fake. It can not prove whether, how, or even if an actual event happened or not. Of course for this premise of ‘fake’ video proving anything one must also believe that during planning…

Someone says, since the plan is to use hijacked airliners, “Hey, let’s not use real planes. Let’s truck the plane parts in, crews to lay them out, people to say they saw planes, etc, et al, and just make some fake videos of planes going into the towers. Now, when we make these fake videos, instead of photoshopping in a commercial airliner with windows, we’ll photoshop in the plane needed to actually do it. Everybody high fives and says, ‘yeah, it’s just our lives on the line for treason.’ “

Next day, the moron is no longer a threat… most likely scenario, taken out by their own family out of fear they’d all be taken out. It’s ludicrous on multiple levels.. Not just one.

The Ivy Flats Video, the testing of the first micro nuke, the Davy Crockett, is a perfect example of a camera that simply is too slow. Sure, cameras are a lot faster now, so have the travel speeds. They capture erratic images AT BEST when velocity exceeds capture speed images/PIXELS distort. Fact as clearly seen on the Ivy Flats video as soldiers move off train watch what happens to their legs. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nv_q8q6Z9_I

Fake video is only important if one NEEDS to disprove video evidence that a SUPER POWERED IRREGULAR SHAPED, NON WINDOWED ‘COMMERCIAL AIRLINER’ FLEW INTO THE WTCS – INDIRECTLY, without drawing attention to the fact a military aircraft flew into the WTCs. It’s still being done today by so called ‘truthers’. Did the ‘truther orgs’ say? The US government has been caught using its own planes to destroy the WTCs? No everything was silent and then came the need for the ‘fake video’ call.

No Windows in Flight 175 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jRC4lCQuBmc&feature=related

Evaluation of Video Footage – for WTC comparisons…

http://911review.org/Wiki/Wtc2PlanePod.shtml

Photo: Boeing N256BA – E-10 MC2A http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3040/2351680318_dcaff7147e_z.jpg?zz=1

Related photos: http://www.spyflight.co.uk/767%20mc2a.htm

There are additional photos in original article ’9 11 Fake Video Stars: The JSTAR Clones. Why Covert Ops Must Have Fake Video 9-11 Fake Video Stars – The JSTAR Clones 10-1-10 Note, the little blue decal up front – one of the WTC witnesses claims to have seen one on the ‘plane that flew into..) BTW, eye witness testimony – the LEAST valuable information WITHOUT additional evidence. http://www.rense.com/general92/911fk.htm

F-4 Phantom at 500 mph into a solid concrete wall http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AB4IEa7jTJw

(Bullets Into Steel – Under pressure and friction metals tend to liquefy) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QfFoMyMoiX4

The wall was 12 ft thick, THE PLANE WAS NOT FILLED WITH WATER, but the tanks were to simulate fuel.

“But there was a test similar to what is described above. In 1988, an unmanned F-4 Phantom, ballasted with water and mounted on rails, was”flown” into a concrete wall at 480 MPH. As reported, the plane crumpled, and penetrated only about 2 inches of concrete. A very impressive test – except it wasn’t meant to be a test of nuclear reactor safety. The wall the F-4 crashed into was not a simulation of a nuclear plant’s wall. It was a 12-foot-thick wall mounted on an air cushion. The test was designed to study impact forces by measuring how far the impact would push the wall. Breaking through the concrete was the last thing any of the involved scientists wanted to achieve. Furthermore, the F-4 was ballasted with water to give it the same weight as a plane fully loaded with fuel, and its final weight was 42,000 pounds. Needless to say, crashing a 412,000 pound 767 loaded with fuel into a fixed wall would have slightly different results.

Because according to a 1982 study by the Argonne National Laboratory in Illinois – a study which was conducted by request of the DOE and the NRC – the explosion from a 707 crashing into a containment dome at 466 MPH would probably overwhelm the reactor’s shielding. Note – that’s a 707, which weighs 336,000 pounds. In 1982 those were big jets. But we’ve “advanced” considerably since then. The 767s that were flown into the World Trade Center weighed 80,000 pounds more than that and carried a lot more fuel.

Other studies, again conducted for the NRC at the Lawrence Livermore
National Laboratory, found that a 125,000 pound jet had a 32 % chance of piercing a containment building’s six-foot base and an 84 % chance of
breaking through the dome.” http://everything2.com/user/DejaMorgana/writeups/Nuclear+Power

“A key report, Sugano et al 1992, covers a rocket sled crash experiment using an F-4D Phantom jet fighter impacting into a 10 foot thick reinforced concrete block.

Sandia notes:
The purpose of the test was to determine the impact force, versus time, due to the impact, of a complete F-4 Phantom — including both engines — onto a massive, essentially rigid reinforced concrete target (3.66 meters thick). Previous tests used F-4 engines at similar speeds. The test was not intended to demonstrate the performance (survivability) of any particular type of concrete structure to aircraft impact. The impact occurred at the nominal velocity of 215 meters per second (about 480 mph). The mass of the jet fuel was simulated by water; the effects of fire following such a collision was not a part of the test. The test established that the major impact force was from the engines. The test was performed by Sandia National Laboratories under terms of a contract with the Muto Institute of Structural Mechanics, Inc., of Tokyo.

With very minimal damage to the concrete target block, the plane and its engines were easily converted into small chunks of metal confetti and shrapnel at the physical interface of the two impact objects. Upon initial impact, the follow-on rear portions of the plane yet to make contact retained their shape integrity until their respective impact. (This seriously contradicts claims by Jean-Pierre Desmoulins that the wings of a 757 would have folded forward, as well as claims in the popular press that the wings folded back before entering the “too-small” hole.) The resulting shear caused debris being spread out to the left, right, and rear of the impact locus, having no ability to proceed in their original vector path, having grossly failed the test of strength with the concrete block. However, the wings are wider than the concrete block, so the wingtips are sheared off whole, and they tumble forward after being cleanly separated from the aircraft.

F4 aircraft impacting a solid concrete barrier. Note that the wings and tail do not fold as the nose impacts the concrete. (source: don’t bother moved -http://www.sandia.gov/media/NRgallery00-03.htm)

Sugano (in itself) doesn’t show that a 757 hitting the Pentagon would be turned into confetti and small chunks, but it does show that an F4 was completely destroyed in arguably similar circumstances. Furthermore, it wasn’t anywhere close to an even contest between the wall and the F4. The F4 started with a speed of 215 m/sec — and the tail was still traveling at 185 m/sec when it smashed into the wall. The F4 is a very strongly build aircraft, although at 18 meters long and 19 kg, it’s about a third the length and a fifth the weight of the 757. In terms of comparing what would happen to a 757 versus what happened to the F4, it would be difficult to do an accurate calculation without detailed design information on both aircraft. In a preliminary analysis, the extra length of the 757 means that it has three times the distance to decelerate — but the 757 is also much heavier, so it’s more difficult for the crushing process to supply enough force to decelerate even as rapidly as the F4 did.” http://www.911-strike.com/missing-confetti.htm The article from the ‘pentagon disinformation unit’ counters the information from the ‘WTC no planes disinformation unit’.

Ed Ward, MD – http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/ ;
https://www.facebook.com/EdWardMD3 ; http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EdWard-MD/messages

More US Drill Death in Waco Explosion – Drill Stops for Reality, Again http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/04/28/more-us-drill-death-in-waco-drill-stops-for-reality-again/

Boston Marathon: The Finish Line For US Treason. Drill Death. Everything’s In Place For Police State. by Ed Ward, MD http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/04/16/boston-marathon-the-finish-line-for-us-treason-drill-death-everything-is-in-place-for-police-state-by-ed-ward-md/

Pictures: US Boston Weapon – Both ‘Explosions’ – The Secret of the Pure Fusion Weapon – Li7 – Lithium 7 http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/04/19/photograph-of-boston-fireball-2nd-explosion/

Dr. Ed Ward MD, AS, BS, MD – Reporting and investigating Constitutional abuses of the US government for almost 2 decades. AS, BS in Medical Technology – Minor in Organic Chemistry and Physics, volunteer during the Viet Nam war 6 years stateside active duty ‘med tech’ ‘US Air Farce’ – a decade experience in Medical Technology. MD degree from LSU, New Orleans – 2 decades in the field of General Practice. (My) Articles are also referenced by valid experts in their field.

Professor Steven Jones’ WTC 9 11 ‘Treasonous Tritium Truth?’: When 20 Is Normal, How Does 1,092 Equal ‘Traces’? Basic Math, Law and Lies.

1. “Obstruction of Justice” – http://definitions.uslegal.com/o/obstruction-of-justice/ – “hiding evidence” is part of the classic textbook definition of Obstruction of Justice. To “conceal” or lie about evidence of a crime makes one an accessory after the fact to that crime. http://www.sagepub.com/lippmanstudy/state/oh/Ch06_Ohio.pdf

2. Trace definition as it applies to quantity:
Occurring in extremely small amounts or in quantities less than a standard limit (In the case of tritium, this standard level would be 20 TUs – the high of quoted standard background levels.). http://www.thefreedictionary.com/trace

3. The stated values of tritium from the DOE report “Study of Traces of Tritium at the World Trade Center”. “A water sample from the WTC sewer, collected on 9/13/01, contained 0.164±0.074 (2σ) nCi/L (164 pCi/L +/- 74 pCi/L – takes 1,000 trillionths to = 1 billionth) of HTO. A split water sample, collected on 9/21/01 from the basement of WTC Building 6, contained 3.53±0.17 and 2.83±0.15 nCi/L ( 3,530.0 pCi/L +/- 170 pCi/L and 2,830 pCi/L +/- 150 pCi/L), respectively. https://e-reports-ext.llnl.gov/pdf/241096.pdf Pico to Nano converter – http://www.unitconversion.org/prefixes/picos-to-nanos-conversion.html Nano to Pico converter – http://www.unit-conversion.info/metric.html

4. 1 TU = 3.231 pCi/L (trillionths per liter) or 0.003231 nCi/L (billionths per liter) – http://www.hps.org/publicinformation/ate/q2282.html – (My original TU calculations came out to 3.19 pCi/L, but I will gladly accept these referenced minimally higher values. http://www.clayandiron.com/news.jhtml?method=view&news.id=1022 )

5. In 2001 normal background levels of Tritium are supposedly around 20 TUs (prior to nuclear testing in the 60′s, normal background tritium water levels were 5 to 10 TUs – http://www.hps.org/publicinformation/ate/q2282.html ). http://www.epa.gov/safewater/radionuclides/training/downloads/Tech_Notes_for_Method_906_Tritium_06-17-09.pdf May 2009 pg. 4 The reference in the original article was for underground water. This reference is for Surface water. They are essentially the same.

However, groundwater studies show a significanlty less water concentration:
Groundwater age estimation using tritium only provides semi-quantitative, “ball park” values:
• <0.8 TU indicates submodern water (prior to 1950s)
• 0.8 to 4 TU indicates a mix of submodern and modern water
• 5 to 15 TU indicates modern water (<5 to 10 years)
• 15 to 30 TU indicates some bomb tritium http://www.grac.org/agedatinggroundwater.pdf

But, instead of “5 to 15 TU” (which would make the increase in background levels even higher), I will use 20 TUs as the 2001 environmental level to give all possible credibility to the lie of “Traces”.

6. Let’s calculate the proven referenced facts.

Tritium level confirmed in the DOE report of traces of tritium = 3,530 pCi/L (+/- 170 pCi/L, but we will use the mean of 3,530 pCi/L).

3,530 pCi/L (the referenced lab value) divided by the backgroud level of 20TUs (20 X 3.231 p (1 TU = 3.21 pCi/L) = 64.62 pCi/L as the high normal background/standard level. 3,530 divided by 64.62 pCi/L = 54.63 TIMES THE NORMAL BACKGROUND LEVEL
. 3,530 pCi/L divided by 3.231 pCi/L (1 TU) = 1,092.54 TUs

7. This is my ‘fave’ because lies tend to eat their young. Muon physicist Steven Jones calls 1,000 TUs “The graphs below show that hydrogen-bomb testing boosted tritium levels in rain by several orders of magnitude. (Ref.: http://www.science.uottawa.ca/~eih/ch7/7tritium.htm ) – http://www.journalof911studies.com/letters/a/Hard-Evidence-Rebudiates-the-Hypothesis-that-Mini-Nukes-were-used-on-the-wtc-towers-by-steven-jones.pdf Yet, calls the EXACT SAME LEVELS quoted in nCi/L as “Traces” and “These results are well below the levels of concern to human exposure…”. http://www.journalof911studies.com/letters/a/Hard-Evidence-Rebudiates-the-Hypothesis-that-Mini-Nukes-were-used-on-the-wtc-towers-by-steven-jones.pdf Interesting isn’t it.

8. Thomas M. Semkowa, Ronald S. Hafnerc, Pravin P. Parekha, Gordon J. Wozniakd, Douglas K. Hainesa, Liaquat Husaina, Robert L. Rabune. Philip G. Williams and Steven Jones have all called over 1,000 TUs of Tritium, “Traces”. Even at the height of nuclear bomb testing – after thousands of Megatons of nuclear testing – 98% of the rainwater tests were 2,000 TUs or less. https://e-reports-ext.llnl.gov/pdf/241096.pdf (While indeed, the original title of the named authors was ‘Tritium levels Elevated’ they, unlike Jones who just lied about the title, use the same MAJOR flaw of neglecting the volume of the total sample – although one can clearly justify their decision to let the flaw stay with the routine imprisonment of government whistle blowers (Free Bradley Manning).

9. Over one year ago, Steven Jones, Alex Jones, Fetzer, Wood, most of the “BYU crew”, most of the so called “911 Truth” groups/sites and indeed the public at large have been notified by me of the falseness of the “Traces” lie, but instead of promoting the truth and addressing it, have simply run from it and seem to be doing all in their power to suppress it. http://www.rense.com/general80/prov.htm

10. It is also important to note that the tritium present was diluted by at least some portion of 1 million liters of water accounting for BILLIONS of TUs. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EdWard-MD/message/136

As for Jones “Hard Evidence Repudiates…”. The only thing Jones addresses in MY massive amount of evidence is ‘tritium’ AND JONES IS A PROVEN LIAR ABOUT IT. In 7 years can anyone show where Jones, Dr Judy Wood, or any of the supposed ’9 11 truth groups’ – pilots, architects, etc, et al., covert op, cointel – has addressed proven text book nuclear bomb residue evidence in total, the onlg weapon known to exist that can causee all of the WTC ‘anomalies’ on the scale needed. 3 billion pounds of building turned into 2 billion pounds of instant dust, wilting 16 inch thick spires, 8 inch thick I beam horseshoes, ‘hiroshima effect’ spectrum of cancers, 3 massive craters, 5 acres of land at 1800 degrees, no DNA found for more than 1k people, impossible fires, anaerobic combustion, etc, et al.

Jones posted ‘hard evidence’ 3 days after ‘Us Government Usage of Atomic Bombs WTC’ http://www.serendipity.li/wot/ed_ward/use_of_abombs.htm which was getting massive net exposure – 1 million hits in first opening month most of which came in the first few days thanks to Jeff Rense. This was MAJOR factual data for exposing the truth. Enter Jones ‘hard evidence repudiates’ which denies nukes based on a lie about tritium, bypasses all my other evidence and deals with ‘other’ inferior evidence. This was pushed heavily by ’9 11 truth’ covert ops (Much like Dr Judy Wood’s DEW BS is being pushed, which now apparently includes time travel in her list of ludicrous ‘maybes’, what ifs, etc, most of which are secret with no verification that they exist and certainly no verification they exist on a scale needed to destroy the WTCs and under the known environmental conditions that occurred during the WTC demoliton. One doesn’t have to wonder about the outcome of her famous ‘court case’ which names NO WEAPON only a list of never ending possibilities http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:r8-t3n54GkoJ:www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/fraud/911_attack/news.php%3Fq%3D1270671298+&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us) , and still is – every year or so zombie hard evidence, proven lie about tritium – surfaces as ‘new evidence’, again bypassing MASSIVE proven evidence.

Photo: Best – http://k35.kn3.net/taringa/1/0/5/7/0/3/3/mcfsaires/446.jpg?3159 Original find. From Hiroshima to Fukushima http://www.ibtimes.com/hiroshima-fukushima-atom-bomb-anniversary-age-nuclear-power-739233

Related articles:

Dr. Steven Jones and Dr. Judy Wood Lie About ‘Traces of Tritium’ and Neutron Nukes http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/01/16/dr-steven-jones-and-dr-judy-wood-lie-about-traces-of-tritium-and-neutron-nukes/

Bombs in the WTC Buildings Proves Nothing to Racist Fascist Bigots. http://www.thepriceofliberty.org/06/08/21/ward.htm

US Government’s Usage of Atomic Bombs http://www.serendipity.li/wot/ed_ward/use_of_abombs.htm

Update: The US Government’s Usage of Atomic Bombs – Domestic – WTC http://www.usavsus.info/WTC-MoreEvidence.htm

Update: Proven 9-11 Nukes = US Government Involvement http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2010/09/06/proven-9-11-nukes-us-government-involvement/ Updated Broken Links

’9-11 Fake Video’ Stars – The JSTAR Clones http://www.rense.com/general92/911fk.htm
Why Covert Ops Must Have `Fake’ Video

No Windows on Flight 175 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jRC4lCQuBmc&feature=related

Get current on Homeland US Fascism:

More US Drill Death in Waco Explosion – Drill Stops for Reality, Again http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/04/28/more-us-drill-death-in-waco-drill-stops-for-reality-again/

Boston Marathon: The Finish Line For US Treason. Drill Death. Everything’s In Place For Police State. by Ed Ward, MD http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/04/16/boston-marathon-the-finish-line-for-us-treason-drill-death-everything-is-in-place-for-police-state-by-ed-ward-md/

Pictures: US Boston Weapon – Both ‘Explosions’ – The Secret of the Pure Fusion Weapon – Li7 – Lithium 7 http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/04/19/photograph-of-boston-fireball-2nd-explosion/

Ed Ward, MD – http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/ ;
https://www.facebook.com/EdWardMD3 ; http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EdWard-MD/messages

Dr. Ed Ward MD, AS, BS, MD – Reporting and investigating Constitutional abuses of the US government for almost 2 decades. AS, BS in Medical Technology – Minor in Organic Chemistry and Physics, volunteer during the Viet Nam war 6 years stateside active duty ‘med tech’ ‘US Air Farce’ – a decade experience in Medical Technology. MD degree from LSU, New Orleans – 2 decades in the field of General Practice. (My) Articles are also referenced by valid experts in their field.