PhD, Steven Jones Still Lying About Tritium and Thermite

Professor, Steven E Jones, PhD, Still Lying About Tritium and Thermite

steven_jones

 

Update 5-18-14: 9 Months Later, Dr. Steven  Jones, PhD, Still Hiding; Caught Lying

While researching, this posting by Jones on 8-4-13 was noted:

“In this short list of those using ad hominem attacks to hurt others must be Ed Ward, who accused me of lying about tritium traces (in waters associated with the collapsed WTC) when I have in fact told him and others that the observations (1092 units of tritium, see below) could be readily explained through the presence of tritium-back-lighted signs in the buildings. Instead of doing experiments to check this out, he accuses me of lying:

Dr. Steven Jones and Dr. Judy Wood Lie About ‘Traces of Tritium’ and Neutron Nukes….
When 20 = High Normal, How Does 1,092 = Traces? – Ed Ward in link quoted by LesliePOV

- by means of tritium-back-lighting in signs, for example, very common in the time frame when the WTC was built IIRC.

So you tell me, LesliePOV — just WHAT was I lying about?”
http://www.ldsfreedomforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=29647&start=60

What is Professor Steven Jones lying about? Jones quotes “When 20 = High Normal, How Does 1,092 = Traces?”  Jones ignores his own quoted question relating to proven facts, but does manage an ‘implied’ lie.

If one didn’t know better, you’d think he knew he was lying by not stating a fact, but making a statement of ‘could readily be explained’, and then interestingly accuses me of not knowing what I have documented with referenced data.

How is 1,092 called traces when 20 is the high normal value?  Steven, traces means less than an expected value.  As per multiple referenced documentation, the highest expected value should be 20.

To use Jones own words, 1,092 is ‘several orders of magnitude’ greater than 20. Try counting to 20, then count to 1,092 and see if you can  the note difference. Would one call 1,092 numbers ‘traces’ after only having to count to 20? How can a LDS, Captain of 1,000, PhD – Muon Physicist searching for the ‘truth’ do it?

So one more time, PhD, Professor, Steven E Jones, “When 20 = High Normal, How Does 1,092 = Traces?”   http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2009/03/08/the-911-wtc-traces-of-tritium-lie-is-obstruction-of-justice-by-accessories-to-murder/

BTW, Steven, just to make sure we are on the same page, the referenced data shows your lies and by definition ‘an accessory to murder’.  Still waiting on Jones to address the referenced evidence.

“7.  This is my ‘fave’ because lies tend to eat their young. Muon physicist Steven Jones calls 1,000 TUs “The graphs below show that hydrogen-bomb testing boosted tritium levels in rain by several orders of magnitude. (Ref.:
http://www.science.uottawa.ca/~eih/ch7/7tritium.htm ) – http://www.journalof911studies.com/letters/a/Hard-Evidence-Rebudiates-the-Hypothesis-that-Mini-Nukes-were-used-on-the-wtc-towers-by-steven-jones.pdf Yet, calls the EXACT SAME LEVELS quoted in nCi/L as “Traces” and “These results are well below the levels of concern to human exposure…”  Interesting isn’t it. Actually, Jones calls 1,000 TUs ‘boosted several orders of magnitude’, one of the two samples of WTC 6 water was 1,092 TUs so to be more precise, the WTC water sample was even LARGER than ‘exact same level’.

Jones continues his lies by the ‘implied’ scam. As I’ve noted many times before, there were no tritium exit signs in the WTC’s.

“Presence of RL EXIT signs in the buildings would have implied large available source of tritium. We were informed by PANYNJ authorities that there were no tritium signs at the WTC, only photoluminesent ones (33)” https://e-reports-ext.llnl.gov/pdf/241096.pdf  This pdf also notes that in a dry fire all tritium escapes into the atmosphere.   Link is in my article Update: The US Government’s Usage of Atomic Bombs – Domestic – WTC  http://www.usavsus.info/WTC-MoreEvidence.htm

Jones “Unexploded’ Thermite Lie Exposed.  http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/05/12/news-miraculous-unexploded-active-super-thermite-burns-at-430-professor-phd-steven-e-jones-search-for-truth/  BTW, Steven, we are still waiting for your definitive research on the ‘unexploded’ thermite you supposedly found.  You know, the unexploded thermite that burns at 430 degrees C, but doesn’t ignite or explode in the massive  military aircraft crash fireball.

twintowers

Update  on Jones and LesliePOV: It seems, LesliePOV, reads my stuff on occasion and laid my referenced facts on him when he asked for ‘A case in point’ or example.  Most Excellent! LesliePOV got an immediate ban, for my calling a liar, a liar.  Jones did what he always does and has to do when confronted by my referenced evidence – like more than a 1,000 people in the WTC, VANISHED WITHOUT A ‘TRACE’ OF A RESPONSE.  Jones was sure he was dealing with someone without my background to deal with information of mine.  When I responded the only place I could, my site, LesliePOV was able to lay the facts on him again – 3rd or 4th time he’s personally been ‘officially notified’ of this information and his fraudulent hoax.  Here’s the post: http://www.ldsfreedomforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=29647&sid=9d6dda4c4fe15a3f9b811e2cc36538c9&start=90#p398635

“Case in point: note I am not accusing you sir… but you did use the tritium backed signs thing on me…

This below is What Ed Ward says === apparently he has picked up on our discussion and answers it on his own website that I am now including below… it is interesting though…
What is Professor Steven Jones lying about? Jones quotes “When 20 = High Normal, How Does 1,092 = Traces?” Jones ignores his own quoted question relating to proven facts, but does manage an ‘implied’ lie. If one didn’t know better, you’d think he knew he was lying by not stating a fact, but making a statement of ‘could readily be explained’, and then interestingly accuses me of not knowing what I have documented with referenced data. How is 1,092 called traces when 20 is the high normal value? Steven, traces means less than an expected value. As per multiple referenced documentation, the highest expected value should be 20. To use Jones own words, 1,092 is ‘several orders of magnitude’ greater than 20. Try counting to 20, then count to 1,092 and see if you can the note difference. Would one call 1,092 numbers ‘traces’ after only having to count to 20? How can a LDS, Captain of 1,000, PhD – Muon Physicist searching for the ‘truth’ do it? So one more time, PhD, Professor, Steven E Jones, ”When 20 = High Normal, How Does 1,092 = Traces?” http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2009/03/0 … to-murder/ BTW, Steven, just to make sure we are on the same page, the referenced data shows your lies and by definition ‘an accessory to murder’. Still waiting on Jones to address the referenced evidence.

“7. This is my ‘fave’ because lies tend to eat their young. Muon physicist Steven Jones calls 1,000 TUs “The graphs below show that hydrogen-bomb testing boosted tritium levels in rain by several orders of magnitude. (Ref.:
http://www.science.uottawa.ca/~eih/ch7/7tritium.htm ) – http://www.journalof911studies.com/lett … -jones.pdf Yet, calls the EXACT SAME LEVELS quoted in nCi/L as “Traces” and “These results are well below the levels of concern to human exposure…” Interesting isn’t it. Actually, Jones calls 1,000 TUs ‘boosted several orders of magnitude’, one of the two samples of WTC 6 water was 1,092 TUs so to be more precise, the WTC water sample was even LARGER than ‘exact same level’.

Jones continues his lies by the ‘implied’ scam. As I’ve noted many times before, there were no tritium exit signs in the WTC’s.

“Presence of RL EXIT signs in the buildings would have implied large available source of tritium. We were informed by PANYNJ authorities that there were no tritium signs at the WTC, only photoluminesent ones (33)” https://e-reports-ext.llnl.gov/pdf/241096.pdf This pdf also notes that in a dry fire all tritium escapes into the atmosphere. Link is in my article Update: The US Government’s Usage of Atomic Bombs – Domestic – WTC http://www.usavsus.info/WTC-MoreEvidence.htm “

Photos:

http://www.pumpitout.com/images/steven_jones.jpg I disagree with the biggest traitor for the US, since there are many that were more active than Jones regarding the false flag operation on the WTCs.  At best, or worst, he’d barely make the top 1,000.  Hell, there are 600 or so just in Congress who deserve more time and accountability than Jones.  Last I heard, one didn’t need to take an oath to support the Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic, as all our treasonous ‘leaders’ have sworn, to be a college professor.

http://www.sott.net/image/image/s7/145104/full/twintowers.jpg  A very interesting fact is noted in this picture. How are there two different flames from the same fireball?  Hint: The fireballs on the left are whitish grey and an almost yellow flame, very similar to the fireball at the Boston Finish Line – Velocity of the explosion is critical to interpretation for exact type of explosion – but there are definitely 2 different ‘fuels’ and combustive processes involved. How does that happen out of one, 1, ‘jet fuel’ combustive process, fire?   Pictures: US Boston Weapon – Both ‘Explosions’ – The Secret of the Pure Fusion Weapon – Li7 – Lithium 7 http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/04/19/photograph-of-boston-fireball-2nd-explosion/

Come Out and Play http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XN32lLUOBzQ

I see a future in LDS first grade math: Class tomorrow  morning, PhD, Professor, Muon Physicist, Steven E Jones is going to teach you ‘Numbers‘ – Homework: From 1 to 20.  And that afternoon, he is going to teach ‘Trace Numbers’ – Homework?: 21 to 1,092?   Although ‘Trace Numbers’ may go to infinity?  BONUS: Where do ‘Trace Numbers’ end?  55 times the amount, even after dilution by 1 million liters – 1/4 million gallons of rain and ‘fire hose’ water’ doesn’t seem to be enough.  How about 100 times? 1,000 times?  Shouldn’t it at least be ‘several orders of magnitude’?  Especially after dilution by 1 million liters of water?

Ed Ward, MD – http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/ ; https://www.facebook.com/EdWardMD3 ; http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EdWard-MD/messages

Holy Horus: The Jesus Origin Exposed; The Real Truth About Religion and Its Origins, and Annuit Coeptis Novus Ordo Seclorum  http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/09/18/the-real-truth-about-religion-and-its-origins/

Proven 9-11 Nukes http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2010/09/06/proven-9-11-nukes-us-government-involvement/

1. Three Massive WTC Craters – See us government LIDAR proof: – Nothing else known to man can leave ALL the WTC debris and this particular evidence in the length of time needed , except a third generation Micro Nuke – Mini Nuke – Nuke. It’s 100% classic textbook nuclear event residue – ZERO ANOMALIES. http://www.usavsus.info/WTC-MoreEvidence.htm – Best,

2. Five Acres (1.2 Billion Pounds = Weight of Residue of 3 WTC Buildings (WTC 1, 2, 6 and 7) of WTC Land Brought to Searing Temperatures in a Few Hours by an ’Anaerobic, Chlorine Fueled “Fire” – Impossible by Basic Laws of Physics. See us gov Thermal Images proof – Nothing else known to man can leave ALL the WTC debris and this particular evidence in the length of time needed , except a third generation Micro Nuke – Mini Nuke – Nuke. It’s 100% classic textbook nuclear event residue – ZERO ANOMALIES. http://www.usavsus.info/WTC-MoreEvidence.htm Best, See: Update http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/02/18/correction-9-11-wtcs-1-2-6-and-7-neutron-nuked/

3. Tritium Levels 55 Times (normal) Background Levels assessed a numerical value of ‘traces’ and ‘of no human concern’. See us government (DOE report) proof: – Nothing but a NUCLEAR EVENT can cause ‘tritium’ formation – basic physics fact – Nothing else known to man can leave ALL the WTC debris and this particular evidence in the length of time needed , except a third generation Micro Nuke – Mini Nuke – Nuke. It’s 100% classic textbook nuclear event residue – ZERO ANOMALIES. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EdWard-MD/message/141

4. An Impossible “Fire” (Combustion Process). See Laws of Physics for Fire/Combustion Process and Dr. Cahill’s data on ‘anaerobic incineration’. – Nothing else known to man can leave ALL the WTC debris and this particular evidence in the length of time needed , except a third generation Micro Nuke – Mini Nuke – Nuke. It’s 100% classic textbook nuclear event residue – ZERO ANOMALIES. http://rense.com/general77/newlaws.htm

5. 3 Billion pounds of building instantly turned into 2 Billion pounds of micronized dust. – Nothing else known to man can leave ALL the WTC debris and this particular evidence in the length of time needed , except a third generation Micro Nuke – Mini Nuke – Nuke. It’s 100% classic textbook nuclear event residue – ZERO ANOMALIES. http://www.serendipity.li/wot/ed_ward/use_of_abombs.htm Best

6. 16 inch steel Spires that withstood 1/2 a Billion pounds of building falling on them and suddenly turn into limp noodles and partially vaporize. Nothing else known to man can leave ALL the WTC debris and this particular evidence in the length of time needed , except a third generation Micro Nuke – Mini Nuke – Nuke. It’s 100% classic textbook nuclear event residue – ZERO ANOMALIES. http://www.usavsus.info/WTC-MoreEvidence.htm Also: The Collapse of the Spire http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7W0-W582fNQ

7. Hiroshima effect cancers in responders and locals. Nothing else known to man can leave ALL the WTC debris and this particular evidence in the length of time needed , except a third generation Micro Nuke – Mini Nuke – Nuke. It’s 100% classic textbook nuclear event residue – ZERO ANOMALIES. http://www.usavsus.info/WTC-MoreEvidence.htm , http://www.serendipity.li/wot/ed_ward/use_of_abombs.htm

All of the above are facts are proven with referenced links of reputable data sources – many are from the government itself and more…

US Government ‘Carrots’: The Eternal Path to Servitude http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/06/10/us-government-carrots-the-eternal-path-to-servitude/

America’s Only Real Choice: Constitution or Tyranny? http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/06/09/americas-only-real-choice-constitution-or-tyranny-2/

The US: “A Distorted, Bastardized, Illegitimate Government.” http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/06/09/the-us-a-distorted-bastardized-illegitimate-government/

Two FBI Agents Murdered Over Danny’s $235,000? The Closing of ‘Loose Lips Sinks Ships’? http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/05/26/two-fbi-agents-murdered-over-dannys-235000-the-closing-of-loose-lips-sinks-ships/

Update: Witnesses Saw People ‘Vaporized’ on 9 11 http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/05/21/update-witnesses-saw-people-vaporized-on-9-11/

Dimona Does Damascus: Israeli Nukes in Damascus, Syria http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/05/06/dimona-does-damascus-israeli-nukes-in-damascus-syria/

More US Drill Death in Waco Explosion – Drill Stops for Reality, Again http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/04/28/more-us-drill-death-in-waco-drill-stops-for-reality-again/

Boston Marathon: The Finish Line For US Treason. Drill Death. Everything’s In Place For Police State. by Ed Ward, MD http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/04/16/boston-marathon-the-finish-line-for-us-treason-drill-death-everything-is-in-place-for-police-state-by-ed-ward-md/

Pictures: US Boston Weapon – Both ‘Explosions’ – The Secret of the Pure Fusion Weapon – Li7 – Lithium 7 http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/04/19/photograph-of-boston-fireball-2nd-explosion/

The US Wouldn’t Nuke Its Own People – Wake Up and Glow http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/04/13/the-us-wouldnt-nuke-its-own-people-wake-up-and-glow/

Proven 9-11 Nukes http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2010/09/06/proven-9-11-nukes-us-government-involvement/

9 11 Fake Video Stars: The J Star Clones – Why Covert Operation’s Cointel Must Have ‘Fake’ Video and ‘No Planes’ http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/05/05/9-11-fake-video-stars-the-j-star-clones-why-covert-operations-cointel-must-have-fake-video-and-no-planes/

Bill Moyers, The Secret Government: The Constitution in Crisis – 1987 – Part 1 of 9 http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/06/04/bill-moyers-the-secret-government-the-constitution-in-crisis-1987-part-1-of-9/

FIXED VOTE = NO VOTE – I WILL NOT ASSIST ‘THIN AIR VOTE COUNTING’. http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2009/10/23/fixed-vote-no-vote-i-will-not-assist-thin-air-vote-counting/

Israel’s WWDs: German Made Nuclear Armed Dolphins http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/07/28/israels-wwds-german-made-nuclear-armed-dolphins/

Dr. Ed Ward MD, AS, BS, MD – Reporting and investigating Constitutional abuses of the US government for almost 2 decades. AS, BS in Medical Technology – Minor in Organic Chemistry and Physics, volunteer during the Viet Nam war 6 years stateside active duty ‘med tech’ ‘US Air Farce’ – a decade experience in Medical Technology. MD degree from LSU, New Orleans – 2 decades in the field of General Practice. (My) Articles are also referenced by valid experts in their field. Dr Ed

Tags: , , , , ,

16 Responses to “PhD, Steven Jones Still Lying About Tritium and Thermite”

  1. Michael Volkmann Says:

    Reblogged this on Michael Volkmanns Blog.

  2. benadrit Says:

    Anyone who thinks Jones has a shred of dignity needs to watch heavy watergate. He was a puppet pulled out by his CIA pals (and whatever other alphabet soup boys were around) to concoct a second fairy tale. When the masses started to yell the emperor has no clothes because the main line was too much to swallow, out came the thermite. I don’t know what they have on him but the Langley boys own him lock, stock, and barrel.

    • Ed Ward MD Says:

      9 11 was not Jones first covert op coverage. The government used him to destroy ‘cold fusion’. Good ole Mr Muon, somehow proved cold fusion wasn’t possible because there was not enough energy in muons to produce ‘cold fusion’. And the fact that Pons and Fleischmann stated the same premise in their paper – muons did not contain enough energy for the process, so something else was going on. Good comment Benadrit. I usually don’t post unreferenced data statements, but I’m familiar with ‘heavy watergate’. I believe I’ve used it as a link in the past, dealing with Jones’ government history. Best, Ed

      • benadrit Says:

        Sorry if that wasn’t up to your standards. I’ve been out of the writing side for too long. here’s a link for those interested: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j8jR2N6TP_0
        At the heart of everything you say is what is the evidence? Mostly that is physics, with a not inconsequential level of particle debris. That being said I was simply adding, as like you said, you’ve mentioned before, Jones is a liar. The main cheerleader for the proponent of thermite is Jones. His statements on Pons and Flieshman’s work were I believe under oath, Which of course makes him a perjuror. Perjuror do not make good witnesses, period.

        Side note : Dr. Wood I think is completely different. Wrong, and too invested in shining the spotlight on what could be a problem at some point, to be thinking clearly. I do think that she’s trying to do right, but ego got in her way. In short she’s not a monster. cough (Jones) cough.

        benadrit Aug 8, 11:49 am
        God I wish I’d edited the last. Sigh.

        • Ed Ward MD Says:

          Re: Standards… no big deal. This is a truth site, so usually, any statement of fact needs a reference. All sites are different, some don’t like links, some do. Your post brought up something I wanted noted – the cold fusion scam, so it made the cut without the link. So again, not a biggie. Thanks for the link.

          As for Wood, I’m glad to see more people realizing her efforts are complete disinformation BS. As for her motives, the facts indicate she’s cointel per numerous articles, including mine. If the people ever decide to put a stop to this fascism, the data from their own spy system will fry ALL the accessories to treason, murder and crimes against humanity.

          Unfortunately, I don’t see that happening until things get much worse, and by that time the response is likely to be violent. Violence is what they want. It’s what they need to justify more fascism.

          There is no need for action. Inaction is what is required, and it’s a lot harder than action. The ONLY thing that has ever worked against homegrown government fascism is WORK STRIKES and BOYCOTTS.

          Thanks for the comments. Ed

  3. Ed Ward MD Says:

    He can run, but he can’t hide.

    Case in point: note I am not accusing you sir… but you did use the tritium backed signs thing on me…

    This below is What Ed Ward says === apparently he has picked up on our discussion and answers it on his own website that I am now including below… it is interesting though…
    What is Professor Steven Jones lying about? Jones quotes “When 20 = High Normal, How Does 1,092 = Traces?” Jones ignores his own quoted question relating to proven facts, but does manage an ‘implied’ lie. If one didn’t know better, you’d think he knew he was lying by not stating a fact, but making a statement of ‘could readily be explained’, and then interestingly accuses me of not knowing what I have documented with referenced data. How is 1,092 called traces when 20 is the high normal value? Steven, traces means less than an expected value. As per multiple referenced documentation, the highest expected value should be 20. To use Jones own words, 1,092 is ‘several orders of magnitude’ greater than 20. Try counting to 20, then count to 1,092 and see if you can the note difference. Would one call 1,092 numbers ‘traces’ after only having to count to 20? How can a LDS, Captain of 1,000, PhD – Muon Physicist searching for the ‘truth’ do it? So one more time, PhD, Professor, Steven E Jones, ”When 20 = High Normal, How Does 1,092 = Traces?” http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2009/03/0 … to-murder/ BTW, Steven, just to make sure we are on the same page, the referenced data shows your lies and by definition ‘an accessory to murder’. Still waiting on Jones to address the referenced evidence.

    “7. This is my ‘fave’ because lies tend to eat their young. Muon physicist Steven Jones calls 1,000 TUs “The graphs below show that hydrogen-bomb testing boosted tritium levels in rain by several orders of magnitude. (Ref.:
    http://www.science.uottawa.ca/~eih/ch7/7tritium.htm ) – http://www.journalof911studies.com/lett … -jones.pdf Yet, calls the EXACT SAME LEVELS quoted in nCi/L as “Traces” and “These results are well below the levels of concern to human exposure…” Interesting isn’t it. Actually, Jones calls 1,000 TUs ‘boosted several orders of magnitude’, one of the two samples of WTC 6 water was 1,092 TUs so to be more precise, the WTC water sample was even LARGER than ‘exact same level’.

    Jones continues his lies by the ‘implied’ scam. As I’ve noted many times before, there were no tritium exit signs in the WTC’s.

    “Presence of RL EXIT signs in the buildings would have implied large available source of tritium. We were informed by PANYNJ authorities that there were no tritium signs at the WTC, only photoluminesent ones (33)” https://e-reports-ext.llnl.gov/pdf/241096.pdf This pdf also notes that in a dry fire all tritium escapes into the atmosphere. Link is in my article Update: The US Government’s Usage of Atomic Bombs – Domestic – WTC http://www.usavsus.info/WTC-MoreEvidence.htm

    Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. YE SHALL KNOW THEM BY THEIR FRUITS. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? …IN OTHER WORDS: FEMINISM IS COMMUNISM IN ‘DRAG’

    http://www.ldsfreedomforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=29647&sid=218dc6d26de1311e46882457dce404b9&start=90

  4. ej Says:

    love reading your articles and i love your wok with jeff prager. couldnt agree more about the disinfo programs with jones. ppl clinged to that thermite dusts for a long time. alex jones was monumental in bringing that to peoples attention. my emails are down. what do you reccomend using for secure email. sorry to be off topic. but i really look up to you for information.

    • Ed Ward MD Says:

      ej, Thanks for the comment. “Now in the midst of an escalating fight from the federal government aimed at cracking down on encrypted communications, one of the last free and secure services has thrown in the towel under mysterious circumstances.

      “I have been forced to make a difficult decision: to become complicit in crimes against the American people or walk away from nearly ten years of hard work by shutting down Lavabit. After significant soul searching, I have decided to suspend operations,” owner and operator Ladar Levison of Dallas, Texas wrote in the statement. “I wish that I could legally share with you the events that led to my decision. I cannot.” http://rt.com/usa/lavabit-email-snowden-statement-247/ Lavabit was an excellent encryption – email was run through 3 military grade encryption programs. IMO, the Lavabit CEO deserves an awesome amount of ‘credit’ for his sacrifice to expose fascism and NOT COOPERATE.

      Silent Circle being shut down. http://gizmodo.com/another-secure-email-service-silent-circle-is-shuttin-1075763867

      Tor says… http://gizmodo.com/the-tor-project-tells-everyone-to-stop-using-windows-1041096346

      NSA Target: http://gizmodo.com/what-it-means-to-be-an-nsa-target-1076266918

      Confronting the latest attack on our privacy and freedom
      Lavabit: A Profile in Corporate Principles and Personal Courage http://www.thiscantbehappening.net/node/1912

      Snowden, would have known where to look to close any back doors into his computer. Once you know where to look for NSA access, military grade encryption should work, provided the company isn’t being forced secretly to give up the code. But, if one does not know where to look to cut direct access to your computer, I don’t recommend ‘feeling safe’ even with encryption.

      Best, Dr Ed

  5. Anonymous Says:

    I’ve always thought the real issue here was not how the deed was done but who orchestrated it.
    Doug Johnston

  6. Ed Ward MD Says:

    The 5 Most Extreme Atomic Experiments. http://www.physicscentral.com/buzz/blog/index.cfm?postid=3351964621314250596

  7. Leslie Says:

    Ed- I include hereafter a reference I found after my ‘debate’ with ‘Professor’ jones on the LDS ‘Freedom” Forum re: the physical impracticality of ‘covert’ emplacement of enough ‘thermite’ (or whatever) to actually bring a building down that is over twice the size of the prior Guinness world record implosion,,, namely JLHudson store Detroit in ’98. I reasoned that a building twice as big would be twice the job of loading explosives. Example: since CDI’s JLHudson demolition crew of 12 took 24 days to strategically load just 2700lbs of high explosives, then doing just ONE of the WTC towers should have taken TWICE AS LONG. (‘professor’ disagreed but would not supply me with any clues as to which way he supposes I was wrong as he was evidently just defensively sniping at me).

    “It was not until 1919 that the scaling laws for simple explosions were expressed succinctly. A presentation by Hopkinson to the British Ordnance Board was not conveyed mathematically, but was of classic significance. He pointed out that if two structures were made to the same drawings and of similar materials, but on different scales, and if charges were detonated to produce similar structural effects, then the weights of the charges needed to be proportional to the cubes of the linear dimensions. This law was, apparently, discovered independently in 1926 by Cranz.”
    Above excerpt from pg xvii (introduction) Explosive Loading on Engineering Structures, PS Bulson, 1997

    Am I correct in reading this that doubling the size of a building means it would take 9x the explosives to be loaded???

    Or would this only apply to the sizing of a aerial bomb big enough to drop on it or to the sizing of a truck-bomb or the like?

    I ask this because in commercial demolitions/implosions they are drilling into the concrete columns to tightly pack explosives for efficient breakup effect… and for the steel they are using shaped cutting charges.

    • Ed Ward MD Says:

      Leslie,

      I looked into and dealt with this briefly in US Government Usage of Atomic Bombs, and thought you did a very good job on the subject. The breakdown on the manhours needed was very insightful. You have a good eye for BS. Thanks again for your efforts. WTC 1, 2 were extremely more structurally sound than the dept building, the WTC had MASSIVE REDUNDANCY and SIZE in its support structure.

      Structure and design are important, one can not make 2 x the size = 9 x the explosive. One could only make that argument, for virtually identical buildings with the only variance being size, but two different buildings, no. The referenced equation does give a ‘relative’ ‘view’ of the amounts of explosive, manhours, time, etc, needed for ‘larger’ demolitions. Bearing in mind, manhours are direct access, rip out walls, whatever is needed to get to the structure. The WTCs would not have had that extensive access. So while not definitive proof, 2x = 9, it is excellent for a ‘relative’ view and circumstantial evidence.

      Cutting charges are the only thing they could use on the smaller size girders.

      As for ‘truck’ and ‘car’ bombs. Anything that makes a crater in a car or truck bomb is a nuke, unless the ‘truck’ is a semi trailer that can handle 30,000 lbs of explosive. BLU 82 MOAB – 6.2 Tons of High Grade Military Explosive – No Crater. Also note the marked difference in a MOAB explosion vs a nuclear one. MOAB – flame spreads horizontal and stays low with very little rising flame. Nuke – flame rises in typical mushroom fashion. http://edwardmd.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/daisy-cutter-hires.jpg

      As for concrete, 2 different applications. Faster than sound percussion vs speed of light heating of residual water in concrete which essentially makes ‘concrete’ an ‘explosive’.

      Ed

  8. David Mende Says:

    So, the new WTC is made of concrete. Vulnerable to ERW nukes? Does concrete explode by radioactive exposure? And, what caused the flags at the Boston bombing to extend and wave for extended period after the explosion? Could this have been a ‘dial-up nuke?’

  9. Crystal Says:

    Lately, you can find a great deal of garbage in the cyberspace, is excellent to see that there are still nice
    web blogs around.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 84 other followers

%d bloggers like this: